Skip to main content

Azure Front Door custom domain quote limit and solutions

By

When you reach the quotes of Azure Services you need to roll up your sleeves and go back to the design board. 

Business context

A company has around 20-50 products that are available in the EU, APAC and all US states. Each product can have around 5-15 different presentation web site (including custom domain) in each country. 

Technical constraint

The customer is using Azure and one of the technical objectives is to use only Azure Services, without any other 3rd party providers. Azure Front Door is in front of their API, used to map all the custom domains redirection to the main domain and to manage the security rules. The security rules are changed often (every day) - at least 3-4 rules per day, making the WAF component of Azure Front Door a goldmine for the operational team.

US: 20 products X 10 custom domains X 50 US states =10000 web site and 1000 custom domains

          EU: 20 products X 10 custom domains X 10 EU countries =2000 web site and 1000 custom domains 

The reality is not that we have 12000 custom domains in the EU and the US. For now, there are around 900 and the forecast for the next 3 years is up to 2000 custom domains in total. 

The current quote of the custom domain for Azure Front Door and the rest of Azure services is 500 per instance. This is a hard limit and cannot be changed. To be able to handle 900 or 2000 custom domains we need to find another method to map the domains.

Possible solutions

The top 3 options available, that are easy to implement are:

  1. Spin-up Azure VMs or a containerization solution and install a reserve proxy (Nginx). Use Azure Front Door for the main domain and for all security rules (WAF)
    • Pros: easy to configure
    • Cons: scalability, availability and the risk the reach the 500 custom domain limitation
  2. Use a 3rd party provider in the front for custom domain redirect and keep Azure Front Door for the main domain and for all security rules (WAF). 
    • Pros: low operational cost
    • Cons: 3rd party, that is not part of Azure Services
  3. Use multiple Azure Front Doors, one as the main, for the main domain and all security rules (WAF). Configure multiple Azure Front Doors in the front of the main one only for custom domain redirects. 
    • Pros: easy to manage and all services are part of Azure portfolio
    • Cons: Multiple Azure Front Door instances might add an extra complexity layer

Option no. 3 with multiple instances of Azure Front Door looks to be the winner. Easy to configure, scalable and cost prediction done easily. For example, for 900 custom domains, we need:
  • 1 X Premium instance for the main domain and WAF / €139
  • 2 X Standard instances for the custom domain mapping / €29.4 (2 X €14.7)
For 2000 custom domains, we need to increase the no. of Standard instances:
  • 1 X Premium instance for the main domain and WAF / €139
  • 2 X Standard instances for the custom domain mapping / €58.8 (4 X €14.7)
Another advantage of this solution is the segregation of roles. The role that manages the WAF and security rules is different from the one that is managing the custom domain. You can even extend the concept and have Azure Front Door instances per region for the custom domains, fully managed by the local teams.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

By
In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

By
Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

By
The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...
Post a Comment
Read more