Skip to main content

Near real time data processing using Event Hub, Stream Analytics and Azure Redis Cache

Caching is one of the most common solutions used to increase the performance of an application and to protect the databases from throttling and intensive queries. In this article, we analyze if a standard cache solution is our best option all the time.

Context

We are working on a web application with a frontend and an API consumed by the front-end and other 3rd parties systems. We don’t have control on the 3rd parties, but every 2 months, the number of request increase with 200%.

The current solution build by the team is written in .NET Core and runs inside Azure App Services. In-memory caching is used for content that is often retrieved from the database (Azure SQL DB).

New Gen

The number of Azure App Services Instances increased, and to protect the database and backend, the team decides to disable stick session (session affinity) and migrate to a distributed cache solution.

The team decides to use Azure Redis Cache and to split the cached content into 3 different cache repositories:

  • The Common Cache used to cache content that is not tenant or user-specific
  • The Tenant Cache used to cache tenant-specific content
  • The User Cache is used to cache user-specific content per session. This content is all the time encrypted.

The solution is implemented in 2 weeks of work, and in 6 weeks, it goes into production. It is a big success; the average response time decreased by 30% and the load on the database and backend decrease drastically.

Team no. 2

In parallel with our team, another team is working on adding new functionality that enables users to see real-time the current status of devices in all the factories around the globe (1.5M devices). The status of each device is updated every 2s.

Because on the roadmap, the Tenant Cache was already planned, they decide to use also the cache to store the state of the devices.

BOOM!

The integration goes well, and all performance tests are a big success. Once they go into production, the response time of Azure Redis Cache increase from a few ms to 10–15s. All the read and write operations to the cache are slow.

The cluster size of Azure Redis Cache is increased, but the running costs too high for the business, and the real-time monitoring feature of devices is disabled.

What happened?

Azure Redis Cache is amazing and works great as long as you use it for high number of read operations and a low number of write operations. By updating every 2s the state of each device, the load of the tenant cache increased with 750k write operations per second. Even if the load is distributed over multiple regions around the globe, the number of write operations was over 150k per region.

The performance tests that were run before going live weren't able to increase the write/update load on Azure Redis Cache enough to be able to detect this problem.

Solution

By design, it does not make sense to update the state of a device if remains the same. Taking this into account, the state of devices is stored inside Azure Redis Cache, but updated only when is changed.

In normal conditions, the state of a device changes every 4–16h only and in a timeframe of 1h a maximum of 20% of devices state is changed.

Even so, from the business point of view, the 2s heartbeat is essential and cannot be changed. For example to be pushed only when the device has a new state.

The redesign solution is collecting the device heartbeats into Azure Event Hub. The information is forwarded to Azure Stream Analytics that is configured in such a way to detect when the state of the device changed. When a new state is detected, an Azure Function is called that updates the value from Azure Redis Cache.

In this way, the solution is able to ingest a high number of notifications from devices and analyze in near-real-time and store the device state in a storage that is optimized for a high number of read operations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...