Skip to main content

IoT Home Automation | Stabilize the garage doors solution after power break (resistors and capacitors)

A few weeks’ ago, I added the proximity sensors to the garage doors. Everything was perfect until the first power break when one of the garage doors automatically open. Initially we did not know what was the cause, so after a few weeks same thing happen 2 or 3 times.

Root Cause
Because of this instability, I had to shut down the ESP8266. You do not want the garage door open when you are not home and you have a dog that might eat even the car itself (smile).
It seems that this is a common problem when you use ESP8266 connected to a power source that is not stable. The problem is hard to replicate without a power break. When a power break occurs and the power is back there is a fluctuation in the electrical current that is hard to replicate.
This happens on all digital ports except D1. On D1 it seems that the version of ESP8266 board that I have has a resistor that does his job.
Additional to this the number of consumers is pretty high with the additional proximity sensors attached to the ESP8266. Extra consumer affect in combination with electrical fluctuations can affect for short periods of time the ESP8266 behavior. In my case even a 0.1s pulse of energy on D2 triggers the garage doors.

Solution
To solve this problem I decided to do two things. One was to add a resistor on D2 to cut any energy fluctuations  that might appear when the power comes back. The second was to add capacitors to 3.3V and 5.0V ports
Resistor
I added a 10k resistor between D2 and Ground. In theory, this should cut short spikes that might come when the power is back. The resistor was added to the board where I have the two relays.


Capacitors
On 3.3V and 5.0V outputs of ESP8266 I added 3 capacitors on each between ground and each output. This should cut all electrical spikes when the energy consumptions is high. For example, when power is back and all sensors are starting.
I added 1 X 1uf, 1 X 10uf and 1 X100uf on 3.3V and another set on 5.0 pins.

Modules
This was a good opportunity to rewire the circuits. I’ve done things a little more modular, a board with ESP8266 and another board with relays. Additional to this, for all the wiring between modules and sensors I added reusable ports and some extra wires that will be later use to connect the central unit of alarm system.


Source Code
There were only small updates to the source code. I'm using now D1 and D2 for relays and D3 and D4 for proximity sensors of the gate doors. D5 to D8 are reserved for the alarm system that will be later on added.
#include <Arduino.h>
#include <ESP8266WiFi.h>
#include <ESP8266HTTPClient.h>

#ifdef ESP8266
extern "C" {
#include "user_interface.h"
}
#endif

#define SSID "XXX"
#define PASSWORD "YYY"
#define URLROOT "ZZZ"

void setup() {
  pinMode(D1, OUTPUT);
  pinMode(D2, OUTPUT);
    
  // This is required to read ADC values reliably
  wifi_set_sleep_type(NONE_SLEEP_T);
  
  Serial.begin(57600); 
  
  // Delay is required only for debugging
  delay(2000);
  Serial.println("Setup complete");
  
  WiFi.mode(WIFI_STA);
}
void loop() {
  int retries = 0;
  if (WiFi.status() != WL_CONNECTED) {
    Serial.println("Not connected to the WiFi.");
    WiFi.begin(SSID, PASSWORD);
    Serial.println("after wifi begin");
    
    while ( retries < 30 ) {
      Serial.println("loop");
      if (WiFi.status() == WL_CONNECTED) {
        break;
      }
      delay(1000);
      retries++;
    }
    Serial.println("Exiting loop() for another wifi try.");
    return;
  }
  else {
    Serial.println("Connected to WIFI!");
  }    
  
  Serial.println(WiFi.localIP());
  
  // Read gate state (1-Open | 2-Close from sensor)
  int gate1State = 1 + digitalRead(D3);
  int gate2State = 1 + digitalRead(D4);
  Serial.println("Gate state: 1-Open | 2-Close");
  Serial.print("Gate 1 state:");
  Serial.println(gate1State);
  Serial.print("Gate 2 state:");
  Serial.println(gate2State);
  HTTPClient http;
  String url = URLROOT"?Id=1&Status=";
  url = url + gate1State;
  Serial.println(url);
  http.begin(url);
  http.setTimeout(3000);
  int httpCode = http.GET();
  Serial.println("HTTP Code for gate 1:");
  Serial.println(httpCode);
  actionOnGate(httpCode,1,gate1State);

  HTTPClient http2;
  String url2 = URLROOT"?Id=2&Status=";
  url2 = url2 + gate2State;
  Serial.println(url2);
  http2.begin(url2);
  http2.setTimeout(3000);
  int httpCode2 = http2.GET();
  Serial.println("HTTP Code for gate 2:");
  Serial.println(httpCode2);
  actionOnGate(httpCode2,2,gate2State);
    
  delay(2000);
}

void actionOnGate(int httpCode, int gateNumber, int gateState)
{
  // 201 Move
  if (httpCode == 201) {    
  Serial.println("201 - Gate move");  
    triggerGate(gateNumber);   
  }
  // 202 Close
  if ((httpCode == 202) && (gateState == 1) )
  {
    Serial.println("202 && gate Open - Gate move");  
  triggerGate(gateNumber);  
  }
  
  // 203 Open
  if ((httpCode == 203) && (gateState == 2) )
  {
  Serial.println("203 && gate Close - Gate move");  
  triggerGate(gateNumber);  
  } 
}

void triggerGate(int gateNumber){
  Serial.println("Open Relay"); 
  digitalWrite(D(gateNumber), HIGH);    
    delay(2000);
    Serial.println("Close Relay");
  digitalWrite(D(gateNumber), LOW);    
}

uint8_t D(uint8_t index) {
  switch (index) {
    case 1: return D1;
    case 2: return D2;
  }
}             

Next step
For the current solution there is 4 weeks trials before I'll make the box for it. Next week I hope to have some time to play around the alarm.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...