Skip to main content

New Azure role - Azure Billing Reader

There is a small new feature on Azure Billing that made my day great. Small things matters and in this case is 100% applicable.

Problem
Until now there was no mechanism to share ONLY billing information with users. You could forward billing information to specific users. This was useful for last month consumptions, but nothing that you could do directly for the current month.

Current solution
Some shortcuts could be done to make available this information.
The most simple way is  to give to the user the Co-Administrator rights. This will work great, but that user will have access to other resources also, not only to the billing data. Having access to all resources can be a downside, especially if you need to give access to a non-technical person that might click the wrong button (smile). You might reduce the access by using RBAC (Role-Based Access Control), but you would need some extra configuration steps.
Another approach is by exporting billing and cost information using Azure REST API to PowerBI, where we already have support for different dashboards related to costs. This solution is simple and straightforward, but requires to use and add extra services like PowerBI.

The new way
Starting from now, there is a new role available by default in Azure - Billing Reader Role. This new role allows us to give permissions to an entity to see billing information without being able to see or access other resources that are under that subscription.
This means that we can have Product Managers Accounts Managers that can have access to billing information without being able to view or modify services that are deployed.


The way how this role was implemented is smart. A billing Reader role is without rights to see Resource Groups or anything else that is under them. The same thing is when you want to create a new resource as Billing Reader. You can navigate to the New screen, but you will not be able to specify an existing Resource Group or create a new one. This will limits the actions that a user in this role can do.


Another feature that is nice related to this topic is the ability to let other users to download the invoice. Meaning that we don't need anymore to forward the invoice to others.

Conclusion
Even if this are small things added to Azure, from the usability perspective makes our life much easier and simple.
You can find more about this on Azure blog post.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...