Skip to main content

Migrate data from Azure to on-premises data center using Azure Data Factory

In today post we will talk about Azure Data Factory. But we will try a different approach. We will not look on what are the cores features of Azure Data Factory and when you should use it. Let's take a real life example, when Azure Data Factory can make our life easier.

Scenario
We have a system hosted on Azure that produce each day 100GB of audit data. There is a requirement from our client, to move this data on his own data center, where he will archive the information on tape.

Classical implementation    
The use case is pretty simple, but in the same complex. To be able to offer a reliable communication between this two endpoints, you need to ensure that all content is copied on the client data center. For this purpose you could use different tools, base on what kind of storage you have (SQL, binary/raw data, documents and so on).
In general, audit data can be found as raw data in binary files. In Azure you would use Blob Storage. Other types of storage like Azure SQL or DocumentDB might be to expensive especially because you need to store a high amount of data and in 99% of the cases you will not need to execute queries over this data.
To support this feature you will need a process that is able to copy the content from Azure to on-premises. There are high chances that you would put this process on the client side because it is more simple to allow access to Azure Storage using Shared Access Signature (SAS) keys, than the local storage where you want to copy the content.
You can develop your own solution for migration or you would integrate an existing solution - licence costs + VM costs that do the migration.

Azure Data Factory in Action
Another approach is to use Azure Data Factory. This Azure Service allows us to define a so called 'Copy Wizard' that is able to automatically copy content from one place to another.
In this moment there is full support for:
  • Azure Blob
  • Azure Table
  • Azure SQL Database
  • Azure SQL Data Warehouse
  • Azure DocumentDB (see note below)
  • Azure Data Lake Store
  • SQL Server On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • File System On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • Oracle Database On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • MySQL Database On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • DB2 Database On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • Teradata Database On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • Sybase Database On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • PostgreSQL Database On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • ODBC data sources on-premises/Azure IaaS
  • Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • OData sources
  • Web table
, as source of the copy and:

  • Azure Blob
  • Azure Table
  • Azure SQL Database
  • Azure SQL Data Warehouse
  • Azure DocumentDB (see note below)
  • Azure Data Lake Store
  • SQL Server On-premises/Azure IaaS
  • File System On-premises/Azure IaaS

, as destination.

All the mapping and configuration can be done directly from Azure Data Factory. Mapping of storage (source, destination) or what part of the data we want to move is done from Azure Data Factory portal directly.
On top of this, we can specify to Azure Data Factory a schedule and in which part of the day the content should be moved from one place to another. We can have a pipeline task that is executed only one time or at a specific recurrence.

Monitoring
All the action is audited and change of state and other events are logged and can be monitored from the monitoring component. This web component allow us to see the history of the activities that we done on our Azure Data Factory and detect anomalies (in our case when a copy failed). This monitoring tool is extremely powerful and can be used with success for reporting also.
For example, for activities that are running in the moment when you access the app, you can see the real status of each activity (Waiting, InProgress, Failed, Ready, Skipped, None).

Conclusion
Azure Data Factory is a better solution to copy and move content from one location to another. It is a native out of the box solution, that can be configured in a few minutes. No maintenance, licencing or extra costs. You pay only what you use, when you use. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...