Skip to main content

Why the connection is not closing when I call Close() method of EventHubClient?

This days I saw an interesting question on internet. The response is interesting and should be well known by everyone that is using Event Hub or other services from Service Bus over AMQP protocol.
Question:
Why the connection is not closing when I call eventHubClient.Close() method?
var factory = MessagingFactory
     .CreateFromConnectionString("@#$%");
var client = factory.CreateEventHubClient("rveh");
...
client.Close(); // or client.CloseAsync()

By default, the communication protocol that is used by Event Hub is AMQP. AMQP protocol is using a connection over TCP. Opening and closing a AMQP connection is expensive, but the good part of AMQP is that we have a session that can be persisted and reused between different requests. When we are calling "Close" method, we are only notifying the MessageFactory that we don't need anymore the connection. It will not trigger a close/delete connection between our machine/system and EventHub. MessageFactory is smart enough to be able to reuse the TCP connection.
Taking this into account, calling the Create method can reuse an existing TCP connection. You cannot close the TCP connectio by yourself. The connection is created and managed by the MessageFactory. The connection will be recycled in the moment when GC (Garbage Collection) will run over the internal factory, but there is no control from our side.

Can I control the connection?
There are cases when you want to have control to the life cycle of the connection. A good example is when you need a high throughput to Event Hub from the same machine (sender). In this case you will want to create multiple connections and have a direct control to it.
For this scenario you will need to implement your own MessageFactory.

When the connection is reused?
The TCP connection is reused as long as the connection string is the same.

It is important to remember that "Close" method only notifies the MessageFactory that we don't need anymore the connection, it doesn't close immediately.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provi...