Skip to main content

Who is manage what in cloud (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS)

I expect that all of us heard about IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service), PaaS (Platform as a Service), SaaS (Software as a Service). Nothing special with this, especially in a cloud environment.
Pretty often I discover that the responsibility of the cloud provider and the customer are not very clear. Generally, we expect to have minimum responsibilities when we are using SaaS. In the same time when we are using IaaS we expect to have almost the same control as for On-Premises. But, this is not all the time true.
Let's take the main component of an environment and see who is the responsible for it in Azure - the customer or Microsoft Azure.

Network - The responsibility of the this component is 100% on Microsoft Azure on all the environments (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS). Azure is offering and manage the network where we have our system.
Storage - Similar with Network, this is a component that is manage fully by Azure. From blob storage, to OS images and VM disks, the cloud providers needs to manage and control it. We have only a small degree of configuration that we can do.
Servers - All servers that exist in Azure are managed and control by them (from the hardware perspective). Even for IaaS, we don't have any control at the hardware level.
Virtualization - Lucky, for all environments (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS), the virtualization is managed by Azure. We don't need and want to handle hardware virtualization by our self, especially on cloud.

Until now all the responsibility was on Azure. From now, the responsibility can be on customer part also.

OS - For PaaS and SaaS, the responsibility is on the cloud provider. But, for IaaS, the customer has the full control and can decide what kind of OS wants and can manage the OS by himself.
Middleware - As for OS, the responsibility is at customer level for IaaS and is full managed by Azure for PaaS and SaaS.
Runtime - You can control the runtime only if you have access at OS and Middleware. Because of this this is full managed by cloud provider for PaaS and SaaS. For IaaS, the customer can manage and control it.
Data - Starting with data, more responsibility is on customer side. Only for SaaS environment, the data is managed by Azure. For PaaS and IaaS, the customer has control and the responsibility to manage it.
Applications - For IaaS and PaaS, each customer has the freedom to install any application on the environment that he use. Only for SaaS, you don't have the ability to install any custom application.

As we can see above, Azure fully manage and control Network, Storage, Servers and Virtualization. We only need to manage the layers that are above virtualization, from OS to Applications, based on our needs and type of cloud provider that we are using

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...