[Software metrics] Mean Time Between Failure

[Software metrics] Mean Time Between Failure - MTBF

MTBF - Meantime between failure

In today post I would like to talk about a software metric that can give us information related to the quality of our product and how stable it is – Meantime Between Failure.

This metric measure the time interval between the moment when a failure was fixed (and the system is stable) until the moment when a new failure is detected. We could say that this metric measure the time interval when the system is up and running.

Using this metric, we can obtain to important information related to our system:

How stable our system is
When the next failure will occur

I think that the second point is pretty interesting, especially when we have a system in production. Theoretically, MTBF could tell to the operational and maintenance team when next fail over will have – in this way they can be prepared for it.

MTBF can be calculated in different ways, the most simple formulate for it is the sum of all the time intervals when the system didn’t had a failure divided by the numbers of failure.

In a real product, we expect to have issues open all the time, even if we don’t like this. Because of this we need to define what kind of failures we measure (for example the severity level of them). We should measure the MTBF for critical failures (system is down, clients cannot use application anymore and so on). In a normal product, this kind of failures I would expect to be counted when we would calculate the MTBF.

I calculated the MTBF for a web application that is hosted on Windows Azure from 2011. The MTBF for this web application is around 10 months. The cause of the failures that we had until now was caused by:

A Windows Azure Service was down and we didn't had a fail over solution for it
Client infrastructure was down and we our web application depended on that service

In this post we saw a software metric that can be used with success when we need to predict when the next time when we’ll have a failure is. This metric can be calculated very easily and can help us to understand how stable our system is.

I invite you to calculate this metric for your own system and see what values you get.

Comments

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...

Cloud as a Story - Vunvulea Radu

Search This Blog