Skip to main content

Windows Azure Storage and Read-Access Geo Redundant Feature (Part 2)

Part 1
In the last post we describe the new feature of Windows Azure Storage that give us the possibility to not only replicate the storage content to another datacenter, but also access in in read-only mode when the primary storage is down - Read Access Geo Redundant Storage (RA-GRS)
In this post we’ll talk about some things that we should be aware when we are staring to use RA-GRS.

Retry Policy
First thing that we need to be aware is the retry policy. With geo redundant feature we need another retry policy that can automatically fall back to the second account when the first down cannot be accessed.
For this purpose a new interface was created called “IExtendedRetryPolicy” was created. This new interface comes with a method called “Evaluate” that detect if the operation should be retried or not. Because we have two storage accounts that needs to be checked there is a small change in behavior. We need a mechanism to switch the two accounts and also to take into the consideration the time interval.
For this behavior we have already an implementation “ExponentialRetry” and “LiniarRetry” that take into account all this things. If you have time you can look over the implementation here: https://github.com/WindowsAzure/azure-storage-net/tree/master/Lib/Common/RetryPolicies.
The retry policy is set through Options of different requests or through the client itself.
CloudBlobClient bc = sa.CreateCloudBlobClient(...)
bc.RetryPolicy = new LiniarRetry();
...
OR
BlobRequestOptions bro = new BlobRequestOptions()
{
  RetryPolicy = new LiniarRetry(),
  ServerTimeout TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1),  
};
CloudBlockBlob blob = container.GetBlockBlobReferecen("FooName");
blob.DownloadFile( fileName, FileMode.OpenOrCreate, null, bro );
...
TableRequestOptions tro = new TableRequestOptions()
{
  RetryPolicy = new LiniarRetry(),
  ServerTimeout TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1),  
};
...
QueueRequestOptions tro = new QueueRequestOptions()
{
  RetryPolicy = new LiniarRetry(),
  ServerTimeout TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1),  
};

Location Mode
In the last post we talk about this property, but when we should set this value? This value should be set at the request option object. There we have a property called LocationMode that will allow to do this.
CloudBlobClient bc = sa.CreateCloudBlobClient(...);
bc.LocationMode = LocationMode.SecondaryOnly;
In this example if the primary account is down (404) or we have a timeout expectation, that a fallback to the second account is made.

In this post we saw how we can change the retry policy when we use the Read Access Geo Redundant Storage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...