Skip to main content

How to get the instance index of a web role or worker role - Windows Azure

When we have one or more instances of a specific web role or worker role in the cloud, there are moments when we want to know from the code how many instances we have of the specific type or the index of current instance.
The total number of instances can be obtained using
To be able to detect the index of the current instance we need to parse the id of the role instance. Usually the id of the current instance ends with the index number. Before this number we have ‘.’ character if the instance is on the cloud or ‘_’ when we are using emulator.
Because of this we will end with the following code when we need to get the index of the current instance:
int currentIndex = 0;
string instanceId = RoleEnvironment.CurrentRoleInstace.Id;
bool withSuccess = int.TryParse(instanceId.Substring(instanceId.LastIndexOf(".") + 1, out currentIndex));
if( !withSuccess )
  withSuccess = int.TryParse(instanceId.Substring(instanceId.LastIndexOf("_") + 1, out currentIndex));
Take into account that when you increase and decrease the number of instances, there are situation when you can end up with the following name of the instances:
  • […].0
  • […].1
  • […].3
  • […].4
Two is missing because when we decreased the number of instances from 5 to 4, that instance was stopped.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

GET call of REST API that contains '/'-slash character in the value of a parameter

Let’s assume that we have the following scenario: I have a public HTTP endpoint and I need to post some content using GET command. One of the parameters contains special characters like “\” and “/”. If the endpoint is an ApiController than you may have problems if you encode the parameter using the http encoder.
using (var httpClient = new HttpClient()) { httpClient.BaseAddress = baseUrl; Task<HttpResponseMessage> response = httpClient.GetAsync(string.Format("api/foo/{0}", "qwert/qwerqwer"))); response.Wait(); response.Result.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); } One possible solution would be to encode the query parameter using UrlTokenEncode method of HttpServerUtility class and GetBytes method ofUTF8. In this way you would get the array of bytes of the parameter and encode them as a url token.
The following code show to you how you could write the encode and decode methods.

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…