Skip to main content

Cum putem sincroniza un director cu un blob din cloud.

Ieri am vorbit despre modalitatea prin care una sau mai multe instante de SQL Azure se pot sincroniza.
Astazi o sa incerc sa o ofer o solutie pentru cazul in care un client adauga in mod deconectat date pe blob, pe care noi vrem mai tarziu sa le le sincronizam cu blob-urile din cloud.
Problema: Se da un client care lucreaza cu date din blob-uri in mod deconectat. Se doreste ca la reconectare sa se sincronizeze cele doua storage-uri.
Ati spune simplu, ne apucam sa ne scriem un mecanism prin care sa putem sincroniza cele doua containere de date. Da, e si asta o varianta, dar oare merita sa implementam de la zero acest mecanism. Ati putea spune ca putem vedeam cele doua storage-uri ca si doua directoare si atunci sa folosim un mecanism de sincronizare a directoarelor. Suna bine, dar am o solutie mult mai curata - Microsoft Sync Framework.
Se bazeaza pe idea de a vedea cele doua storage-uri ca si doua directoare( partitii). Folosindu-ne de Microsoft Sync Framework putem sa sincronizam aceste date fara nici o problema.
  FileSyncProvider localfileSyncProvider = new FileSyncProvider(localPathName);
AzureBlobSyncProvider cloudSyncProvider= new AzureBlobSyncProvider(containerName, blobStore);
SyncOrchestrator syncOrchestrator = new SyncOrchestrator();
syncOrchestrator.LocalProvider = localfileSyncProvider;
syncOrchestrator.RemoteProvider = cloudSyncProvider;
Mai sus am dat un exemplu rudimentar la modul in care se poate face o sincronizare intre un directoru local si un blob folosindu-ne de acest framework. Ce mi-a placut pana acuma este ca nu mai este nevoie sa imi bat capul cum sa detectez modific─ârile. Exista deja implementat un mecanism pentru acest lucru, iar in cazul in care dorim unul custom, putem cu usurinta sa inseram mecanismul nostru propriu.
Zilele astea o sa studiez acest framework si o sa revin cu alte posturi. O prezentare interesanta gasiti aici:


Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…