Skip to main content

Azure Redis Cache and connection management

These days I encountered an application deployed on Azure that had connectivity issues with Azure Redis Cache.
The application is a web-based application with most of the logic inside Azure Functions. The system it is using Azure Redis Cache for data exchange between the web-application and the functions behind the scene that is crunching the data.
The deployment is stable and working as expected for 5-10 minutes. After that, it is down for the next 20-30 minutes. The cycle repeats over and over again with a generic error on both sides (Azure Web Application and Azure Functions) that indicates that the source of the problem is Azure Redis Cache.

The errors are similar to the one below:
No connection is available to service this operation: RPUSH ST; UnableToConnect on lola.redis.cache.windows.net:6380/Interactive, origin: ResetNonConnected, 

input-buffer: 0, outstanding: 0, last-read: 5s ago, last-write: 5s ago, unanswered-write: 459810s ago, keep-alive: 60s, pending: 0, state: Connecting, last-heartbeat: never, 

last-mbeat: -1s ago, global: 0s ago, mgr: Inactive, err: never; IOCP: (Busy=0,Free=1000,Min=6,Max=1000), WORKER: (Busy=3,Free=8188,Min=6,Max=8191)

The team first reaction was to change the cache tier from C0 to C2 and C3. The problem started not to appear so often, but the price of cache increased drastically for a system that should cost less than 200 per month.
Their mistake was that nobody took a closer look at the error and the Azure Redis Cache metrics available inside Azure Portal. Inside the Portal, it was pretty clear that:
  • The maximum number of connections allowed to the cache was reached
  • In that times, the number of requests that were missed by the cache was 100%
  • Changing the tier of cache instance just increased the number of connections allowed without resolving the main problem
The high number of connections is not normal for an application that has 5 different times of Azure Functions that are configured in such a way to not run in parallel and the maximum number of requests from the Azure Web App to the cache in the same time is up to 4 different connections.

Taking a look at the code we notified that inside Azure Functions a new connection is open each time when data is written to the cache - but without closing the connection. This means that the connection remains open until the timeout occurs for that connection instance.

Cause: Improper use of the API. Each connection instance (ConnectionMultiplexer) needs to be closed manually or use the IDisposable pattern that it is already available. Once the code was updated, there were no issues anymore with it, and we were able to downgrade the cache tier back to the original one.


ConnectionMultiplexer connection = ConnectionMultiplexer.Connect(RedisCacheConnectionString);

IDatabase cacheDb = connection.GetDatabase();
cacheDb.ListRightPush(key, value);

connection.Close();

OR

using (ConnectionMultiplexer connection = ConnectionMultiplexer.Connect(RedisCacheConnectionString))
{
 IDatabase cacheDb = connection.GetDatabase();
 cacheDb.ListRightPush(key, value);
}

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...