Skip to main content

Azure Policy - An excellent tool for resource governance inside Azure

The number of Azure Regions increases every day. Just a few days ago two new locations were announced. All the things that are now happing related to the cloud are not only crazy but also scarry.

Scarry from the government and legal perspective. For example inside an Azure Subscription, a user can create storages in any location around the globe. What happens if you based in the UK, you have customer information that is not allowed to leave the country.
You might say that you would train the team that has the rights to create new resources only in Azure Regions that are based in the UK. This solution is not enough because from government perspective you don't have a mechanism that would enforce this.

To enforce something like this, Microsoft Azure is offering Azure Policies. This service is allowing us to define a specific list of rules and actions that are applying automatically to resources that are created under particular Azure Subscription or Azure Resource Group (or even Management Group).

For the above example, you can use one of the default policies that are already defined inside Azure Policies - "Allowed Location". This policy enables us to restrict the locations where users can create new resources. In this way, we can control the locations where resources are created. The users would be allowed to create new resources only in the UK.

Additional to the location policy, some other predefined policies are beneficial like:

  • "Not allowed resource types" - This policy restrict users to create specific resources (Eg.: users cannot create Azure SQL Databases).
  • "Allowed Resource Type" - Allow users to create only specific resources that are defined in the policy
  • "Enforce tag and its value" & "Apply tag and its default value" - These two policies enable us to enforce users to specify specific tags to resources and set particular values in certain conditions.


Another essential feature of policies is so-called "Effect". It represents the action that takes place when a specific policy applies to a resource. There are five effects that you can use:

  1. Deny - Fails the request and generate an audit log
  2. Audit - Accept the request and create an audit log
  3. Append - Add additional fields to the request (Eg. add additional tags)
  4. AuditIfNotExist - When the resource does not exist, enable auditing
  5. DeployIfNotExist - When the resource does not exist, create that specific resource (Eg. each Web App shall have an Application Insight created).


You can read more about Azure Policies on the official documentation (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-policy/). But before starting to use them keep in mind the following recommendations:

  • Apply policies at the highest level possible. This policy can be assigned at the next level without any issues.
  • You should reuse policies as much as possible. Features like parameters allow us to reuse policies definition as much as possible. 
  • Don't restrict access from second 1. Try to do a small audit and only after that to define policies that deny specific actions. 
  • For exising environments, start with Audit and only after that Deny specific actions. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too