Skip to main content

Serialized headaches when you combine .NET Core and .NET 4.6

When I'm involved in an application development project, I try all the time to keep the language ecosystem reduced as much as possible. Even if we are leaving in a world where interoperability is higher than ever, there are times when because of this you can lose a lot of time because of it.

Let's take the below example:
  • An Azure Function application wrote in .NET 4.6 that send messages to Azure Service Bus Topic. Inside the message body content is serialized in JSON format
  • An Azure Web App application wrote in .NET Core that receives messages from Azure Service Topic and displays it on the UI.

Everything it is okay until you run the code and an error occurs during deserialization. When you take a look at what you send and receive you see the following:

.NET 4.6 OUTPUT:       @ string 3http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/�k{"CountryCode":"RO","AlertType":0,"Level":5,"ValidFrom":"2018-04-05T10:14:00.0458475Z","Period":"00:02:00"}
.NET Core EXPECT:    {"CountryCode":"RO","AlertType":0,"Level":5,"ValidFrom":"2018-04-05T10:14:00.0458475Z","Period":"00:02:00"}

Both implementations are using Newtonsoft library for content serialization and deserialization, but it seems that the behavior is different.

.NET 4.6 Sample
string jsonWeatherAlert = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(weatherAlert);
BrokeredMessage message = new BrokeredMessage(jsonWeatherAlert);
message.Properties.Add("countrycode", weatherAlert.CountryCode);
topicClient.Send(message);
.NET Core Sample
string bytesAsString = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(message.Body);
WeatherAlert alert = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<WeatherAlert>(bytesAsString);

The root cause of this problem is related to what kind of default serializer it is used behind the scene. One of them it is using DataContract and bytes directly from the stream VS the other one that it is using DataContractBinarySerializer and GetBody<Streeam> to load all bytes.
This difference has a direct impact not only on the Newtonsoft library but also to Service Bus library if you want to use it directly.

To solve the problem you need on the sender or received to change the default serializer library that it is used. In our case, we updated the .NET 4.6 implementation in the following way.
var jsonSerializar = new DataContractJsonSerializer(typeof(WeatherAlert)); 
BrokeredMessage message = new BrokeredMessage(weatherAlert, jsonSerializar); 
message.Properties.Add("countrycode", weatherAlert.CountryCode); topicClient.Send(message);

If you want to find more about it, I invite you to read the following link discussion https://github.com/Azure/azure-service-bus-dotnet/issues/239

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...