Shared Access Signature and Access Level on Blob, Tables and Queues

Some months ago I have some posts about Shared Access Signature (SAS). Yesterday I received a simple question that appears when we start to use SAS over Windows Azure Storage (blobs, tables or queues).
When I’m using Shared Access Signature over a blob, should I change the public access level?
People can have the feeling that from the moment when you start using the SAS over a container or a blob, people will not be able to access the content in the classic way. SAS don’t change the public access level, because of this, if your blob is public, than people will be able to access it using SAS token or with a normal URL.

To be able to control the access to a container or to a blob using only SAS you will need to set the access level of the content to private. This can be made from different locations (Windows Azure Portal, different storage clients or from code). Having a container of blob with the access level set to private means that people with account credentials will be able to access the content.
I recommend you to have different containers for the content that needs to be public and private (and the private content is access using SAS). In this way the content management will be easier. Also, try to generate SAS tokens per blob and not per container, when is possible.
Using the storage account name and access key anybody can access our storage account, even if we are using SAS. From the moment when we start using SAS, our client should not have access to our storage account credentials. Also, using storage account credentials anybody can change our SAS configuration.

In conclusion we could say that from the moment when we start using SAS we should switch the access rights of the blobs and container to private.

Comments

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage. But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too

Cloud as a Story - Vunvulea Radu

Search This Blog