Skip to main content

Converters and IoC containers

Now, using an IoC container is a have to for any kind of project. Even in small and simple project, people started to use an IoC. It is very hard for me to understand why you would use an IoC for any kind of project, because you will raise the complexity without needing it. Also people add to IoC all the objects, they don’t ask themselves if they really need that object in IoC.
What do you think about converters added to the IoC?
Very often people add all the converters to the IoC. Even if there are converters used in only one class. In a big project we can end up with hundreds of converters in the IoC container. Theoretically you could have the case when you need to replace a converter with another one, but how often this will be needed. Also, if you have converters that are used in only one place, changing the converter will required to change the class also (maybe).
I would not add any kind of converters to the IoC. The only type of converters that I would add to the IoC are the one that are used on different components and there is a big chance to be changed. To tell you the true, until now I didn’t had the opportunity to meet that kind of converter : ) .
For example a converter that converts an entity that is received through the wire, will need to be changed if the entity that is received is changed. But in the same time, there are big chances to need to change also your component. Because of this I would not add this converter to the IoC.
In conclusion we could say that in general a converter doesn’t need to be added to IoC. The cases when we really need a converter in the IoC container are rare and isolated.

Comments

  1. The main reason is consistency - if in a project someone decides to inject the dependencies automatically using a DI container, it is easier to inject all dependencies in this way, than to stop in each case to weight if it would be enough to inject it manually or create it directly.

    The more general question is where we should apply IoC - some say that it should be applied only at layer boundaries, other at component (not class) boundaries etc.. - if such a general rule is adopted, it's easier to decide..

    Other rule would be: if two classes should not be tested in isolation, maybe there is no point in using a DI framework between the two.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

Scope
The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

Context
First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…