Skip to main content

Can we mock an extension method?

Pentru teste mai mult ca sigur ati folosit un framework petru a face mock pe diferite obiecte. In general am folosit Moq pentru a putea face mock la date. Este destul de usor de folosit, mai jos puteti sa gasiti un exemplu:
Mock<IService> serviceMock = new Mock<IService>();
serviceMock
    .Setup(x=>x.Call(It.IsAny<string>))
    .Returns(()=> new Result());
Mai sus am creat un mock pentru IService, iar in momentul in care se apeleaza metoda Call cu orice parametru de tip string, se returneaza un nou obiect de tip Result.
Nimic deosebit pana acuma. Dar ce se intampla daca vrem sa facem mock la un extension method. Vestea proasta este ca nu se poate face. Majoritatea framework-urilor pentru mock-ing nu suporta aceasta functionalitate.
Cea mai buna solutie este sa refactorizam codul daca putem. Dar exista cazuri cand acest lucru nu il putem face sau extension method nu este declarat de noi si vine dintr-un assembly exterior.
O solutie comuna, care poate sa fie folosita atat pentru aplicatiile .NET classic, Silverlight, WP7, ... este sa injectam actiunea care apeleaza metoda noastra. De exemplu putem sa extragem intr-un Action actiunea care apeleaza extension method, iar aceasta sa fie injectata prin contructor folosind un factory de exemplu. O alta varianta este sa facem un wrapper peste clasa noastra.
Urmatoarea solutie nu functioneaza pe Silverlight din pacate. Ar fi fost nice sa fie suportatat macar in versiunea 5, dar nici o sansa. Solutie se refera la folosirea Microsoft Moles. Prin intermediul acestui framework putem sa inlocuim orice clasa, metoda cu un mole care sa faca ce vrem noi. Un mole, intercepteaza apelul spre o anumita metoda si se poate executa orice alt cod. Putem sa facem mole la orice fel de metoda, atat statica cat si extension method.

Comments

  1. Un extension method nu e decat o metoda statica, deci nu e de mirare ca majoritatea frameworkurilor de mocking care lucreaza cu metode "ortodoxe" nu au cum sa creeze un mock pentru asa ceva..

    Si Moles sau Typemock Isolator pot sa mockuiasca o metoda statica pentru ca se baga cu CLR profiler-ul si rescriu IL-ul, si alte ghidusii de genul.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Partea interesanta este cand ai un proiect Silverlight si nu ai aceste optiuni.
    Daca ar fi sa aleg intre Moles si Moq as alege Moq, dar uneori nu ai de ales, sau in cazul asta numarul de optiuni este egal cu 0.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Da, in cazul acesta daca mocking framework-ul nu are versiune de Silverlight, cam singura optiune e un adapter sau refactoring daca e posibil..

    ReplyDelete
  4. Am ajuns la o solutie asemanatoare. Putin de refactoring, un factory impreuna cu un adaptor. O sa revin maine cu implementarea exacta.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too