Skip to main content

Where clause

Mai mult ca sigur cu toții am folosit clauza where.
Pe scurt, where este folosit când trebuie sa adaugăm o constrângere la un tip generic specificat la o clasa sau la o metoda.
public class Car<TType>
where TType : ICarModel
{}
In exemplul de mai sus o sa putem folosii tipuri generice TType doar dacă implementează interfața ICarModel. In cazul in care vrem sa specificam ca tipul generic sa fie neaparat o clasa este nevoie sa ne folosim si de cuvantul rezervat class:
public class Car<TType>
where TType : ICarModel, class
{}
In cazul acesta, TType trebuie sa fie obligatoriu sa fie o clasa (nu va putea sa fie o structura de exemplu). Pentru structuri trebuie sa folosim cuvantul rezervat struct:
public class Car<TType>
where TType : struct
{}
Dar dacă vrem sa face new de un obiect de tip generic? In cazul aceasta trebuie sa specificam ca are un constructor default în clasau de where. Din păcate doar constructorul default fără parametri se poate specifica. In restul cazurilor o sa aveți nevoie de un factory sau de reflection pentru a crea noi instante din interiorul clasei Car.
public class Car<TType>
where TType : new()
{}
Gata cu introducerea, sa va zic ce vroiam de fapt. Cand avem 2 clause de where sintaxa este destul de ciudata, trebuie sa specificam de doua ori where.
public class Car<TType,TFormat>
where TType : new()
where TFormat : struct
{}
Mi se pare umpic mai ciudat ca cele doua where-uri nu sunt despartite prin virgula sau alt caracter (cuvînt rezervat).
Voua cum vi se pare sintaxa?

Comments

  1. Probabil ca sa simplifice un pic parser-ul: daca permiteau ceva de genul:
    where TType: IComparable, IEnumerable, TFormat : struct
    compiler-ul ar trebui sa se uite in avand ca sa isi dea seama ca TFormat nu e un tip de baza pentru TType, ci un tip generic..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dar dacă vreau sa specific încă o clasa de "where" nu mai este nevoie sa pun nici o virgula sau un alt caracter special. Mi s-a părut destul de interesant, pana ieri nici nu am observat lipsa acestui semn.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Database Modernization Matters for AI

  When companies transition to the cloud, they typically begin with applications and virtual machines, which is often the easier part of the process. The actual complexity arises later when databases are moved. To save time and effort, cloud adoption is more of a cloud migration in an IaaS manner, fulfilling current, but not future needs. Even organisations that are already in the cloud find that their databases, although “migrated,” are not genuinely modernised. This disparity becomes particularly evident when they begin to explore AI technologies. Understanding Modernisation Beyond Migration Database modernisation is distinct from merely relocating an outdated database to Azure. It's about making your data layer ready for future needs, like automation, real-time analytics, and AI capabilities. AI needs high throughput, which can be achieved using native DB cloud capabilities. When your database runs in a traditional setup (even hosted in the cloud), in that case, you will enc...

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...