Skip to main content

Message queue - cum sa oprim consumul de message dintr-un queue

Pornim de la următorul caz:
Avem o aplicatie ce ruleaza 24h pe zi, 7 zile pe saptamana. Aceasta consuma mesaje din mai multe queue. Pentru a putea asculta la queue avem următorul cod:
System.Messaging.MessageQueue msmq = new MessageQueue(".\\private$\\exemplu");
msmq .ReceiveCompleted += m_ReceiveCompleted;
msmq .BeginReceive();
...
void m_ReceiveCompleted(object sender, ReceiveCompletedEventArgs e)
{
Console.WriteLine(DateTime.Now.ToString());

MessageQueue msmq = (MessageQueue) sender;
msmq.BeginReceive();
}
Intr-un anumit moment, dorim sa oprim consumul de mesaje din queue. Pentru acest lucru apelam
msmq.Close()
Dar avem o surpriza. Mesajele sunt în continuare consuma de către aplicație. Orice am face sau apela acestea sunt în continuare consumate. Pe msdn dacă citim cu atenție pagina care descrie metoda Close() o sa gasim
Close does not always free the read and write handles to a queue, because they might be shared.
Deși pare ciudat la prima vedere metoda Close() eliberează resursele folosite de instanta. Nu oprește instanta sa nu mai consume și alte mesaje din queue.
Solutia pe care o propun este sa ne dezabonam de la evenimentul de ReceiveCompleted înainte sa apelam Close():
msmq.ReceiveCompleted -= m_ReceiveCompleted;
msmq.Close();
O alta solutie ati putea spune ce este ca în metoda ReceiveCompleted sa nu mai apelam BeginReceive() cînd anumite condiții sunt îndeplinite. Problema in cazul acesta ar fi ca noi deja am consuma un mesaj de pe queue, deși poate nu ar trebuii sa consuma mesajul respectiv.
Aceasta problema se poate manifesta și în cadrul unit test-elor, cînd mesajele din queue dispar pur și simplu și nu mai ajung la cine trebuie( cazul în care în mai multe unit teste consuma același queue, iar instantele la MessageQueue sunt statice).

Voi aveți alte soluții la aceasta problema?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see