Skip to main content

Delegates from .NET 1.0 to .NET 4.0

Mai mult ca sigur ati folosit delegate. Sunt utili cand trebuie sa specificam un comportament la runtime si nu la compile time. Prin acest mecanism putem sa scapam de mostenire in locurile unde aceasta a fost folosita pentru a definii un comportament specific.
Exista mai multe tipuri de delegates definite core-ul de .NET:
  • Predicate
  • Action
  • Func
O sa incerc sa descriu pe scurt fiecare tip de delegate:
Action reprezinta o actiune care nu returneaza nici un rezultat. Header-ul la metoda ar fi de forma urmatoare
void fx(T)
Exista mai multe implementari de Action, se pot definii pana la maxim 16 parametrii. In cazul in care avem nevoie de mai mult de 16 parametri, ne putem definii noi propile actiuni, dar nu cred ca este sanatos sa avem o actiune cu 16 parametrii sau mai multi.
Predicate reprezinta o conditie care se ruleaza si care returneaza TRUE sau FALSE
bool fx(T)
Atat Action cat si Predicate apar odata cu .NET 2.0, dar ajung sa fie folosite la adevarata lor valoare abia in .NET 3.5 cand apare si Func impreuna cu expresiile lambda.
Func<T1...,TResult> specifica un delegate care accepta de la 0 la 16 parametrii si returneaza un rezultat de tipul TResult. Este bine de retinut faptul ca tipul rezultatului este definit mereu ca si ultimul parametru.
TResult fx(T1,...)
Acuma ca stim ce reprezinta fiecare din ele, ar fi interesant sa vedem cum au aparut si evoluat in timp.
In .NET 1.0 si .NET 1.1 daca aveai nevoie de un delegate era nevoie sa iti declari un delegate de forma:
delegate bool GetHalfDelegate(int number);
Urmatorul pas era declari o metoda care are aceiasi semnatura cu delegatul pe care l-ai declarat si apoi sa instantiezi o variabila de tipul respectiv.

public bool GetHalf(int number) { ... }
GetHalfDelegate getHalf = new GetHalfDelegate(this.GetHalf);
Pentru a putea apela acest delegate era nevoie de un apel de forma:
int result = getHalf(97);
Odata cu aparitia la .NET 2.0 apare si conceptul de metode anonime. Prin acest mecanism putem sa ne definim o logica fara a scrie o metoda. In cazul nostru nu mai este nevoie sa ne definim medoda GetHalf, ajunge doar ca in momentul in care instantiem variabila getHalf sa scriem codul care vrem sa se execute.
GetHalfDelegate getHalf = delegate(int number)
return number/2;
Lucruriile se simplifica umpic, dar cu .NET 3.5 totul ajunge mult mai simplu. Putem sa ne folosim de Func. Orice metoda definita cu acest antet o sa poata sa fie folosita. Cel care defineste metoda nu va mai avea nevoie sa aibe o referinta la tipul delegat-ului Tot ce mai este nevoie sa scriem este:
Func<int,int> getHalf = (number) => number/2;
Mi s-a parut destul de interesant modul in care sintaxa a evoluat de la 1.0 la 3.5.
In .NET 4.0 nu a mai aparut nimic special la acest nivel, dar cu ajutorul lui var putem sa rescriem codul sub forma
var getHalf = (number) => number/2;
Trebuie avut grija cat de mult folosim aceste elemente. Viteza de executie a codului poate sa scada in care face exces, iar nu in ultimul rand codul scris poate sa fie mult mai greu de inteles.


Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…