Skip to main content

ConvertAll - Conversia unei liste mult mai usor

Avem urmatorul scenariu. O lista de elemente de tip A, pe care trebuie sa o convertim la o lista de tip B. Pentru a putea rezolva aceasta problema putem să implementam operatorul implicit sau explicit de conversie, iar apoi să iteram prin lista pentru a face conversia la tipul B.
List<A> listaA;
List<B> listaB;
...
foreach(A a in listaA)
{
listaB.Add(a);
}

sau
listaB.foreach(item=>listaB.Add(item));
Ambele soluții sunt rezonabile, dar e puțin mai greu de înțeles ca in spate se face o conversie. Pentru a face codul mai clar putem să facem in felul următor:
listaB = listaA.ConvertAll<B>(item => item)
Ce am scris mai sus? Fiecare element din listaA convertestel in tipul B si adaug-al in colecția care rezulta. item => item am putut sa scrie deoarece am presupus ca un operator de conversie implicita sau explicita intre cele doua tipuri a fost deja implementat.
In cazul in care acesta nu ar fi implementat am avea ceva asemanator:
Din
private B ConvertAToB(A a) { return new B(); ... }
...
List<A> listaA;
List<B> listaB;
...
foreach(A a in listaA)
{
listaB.Add(ConvertAToB(a));
}
Am avea:
private B ConvertAToB(A a) { return new B(); ... }
...
listaB = listaA.ConvertAll<B>(item => ConvertAToB(item));
Cea ce am scris mai sus se poate scrie si:
listaB = listaA.ConvertAll<B>(ConvertAToB);
Chiar daca folosim ConvertAll obtinem acelasi rezultat, doar ca folosind ConvertAll obtinem un cod mai clar. Urmatorul dezvoltator care o sa vina dupa noi o sa inteleaga ca aici facem oconversie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…