Skip to main content

AutoMapper - object to object mapper

Acest mic framework ne ajuta cand trebuie sa mapam doua entita cu aceleasi propietati. In mod traditional pentru a face acest lucru trebuie sa scriem ceva de genul:
CarDb carDb = LoadFromDb(id);
// ...
Car car = new Car()
Type = carDb.Type,
Number = carDb.Number,
Owner = varDb.Owner,
RegFrom = carDb.RegFrom
Acest caz apare mai ales cand avem o aplicatie pe mai multe nivele, iar modelul care persista in baza de baza de date si modelul care ajunge la client sunt diferite.
Ce poate sa faca AutoMapper, este sa faca automat copierea valorilor proprietarilor, fara sa mai scrim noi cod. In cazul in care propietatea primeste o alta valorea sau are un nume diferit, putem sa scriem o expresie lambda care sa faca conversia.
Mai jos o sa gasiti cateva exenple:
1. Mapare intre doua entitati Car si CarDb
// Creare mapare.
Mapper.CreateMap<CarDb,Car>() ;
// Conversia propriu-zisa.
Car car = Mapper.Map<CarDb,Car>(carDb) ;
In loc sa avem o lista de propietati la care sa facem atribuiire, a fost nevoie sa apelam doar metoda CreateMap.
2. Maparea a doua propietati de tipuri diferite.
Sa presupunem ca Car contine o propietate IsHit de tip bool, iar CarDb contine aceiasi propietate, dar este de tipul int.
Pentru acest lucru este nevoie sa cream un nou ValueResolver care sa stie sa converteasc─â din int in bool. ValueResolver este un tip de data definit de AutoMapper, folosit pentru a face conversii intre date.
public class HitIntToBoolResolver : ValueResolver<int,bool>
protected ovveride bool ResolveCore(int val)
return val==1;
Iar pentru a face maparea trebuie pe CreateMap sa adaug─âm resolver-ul custom:
car => car.IsHit,
x => x.ResolveUsing<HitIntToBoolResolver>().FromMember( m => m.IsHit));
In acest moment, pentru propietatea IsHit, se va face o conversie automata din int in bool.
3. Cum sa atribuim o valoare custom la o propietate.
Sa presunem ca entitatea Car are o propietate FullNumber de tip string formata din RegDate+Number. Pentru a putea seta aceasta valoare in AutoMapper este nevoie sa scriem urmatorul cod:
car => car.FullNumber,
x => x.MapFrom( e => e.RegDate.ToString() + e.Number ));
In acest fel putem genera valori custom orice propietati.
4. In cazul in care entitatea are propietati care la randul lor trebuie mapate, ajunge sa definim maparea tuturor tipurilor de date implicate, in ncazul nostru este nevoie sa definim o mapare in plus pentru tipul de data Builder( presupunem ca entitatea Car are o propietare cu numele BuildBy de tip Buildder.
AutoMapper va detecta automat ca aceasta propietate este deja mapata si va folostii maparea definita deja.
Mapper .CreateMap<CarDb,Car>();
Car car = Mapper.Map<CarDb,Car>(carDb) ;

Din punct de vedere a vitezei, nu va asteptati sa fie la fel de rapid. In spate AutoMapper se bazeaza pe Reflection. Fata de o mapare manuala este undeva de 6-7 ori mai lent. In cazul in care nu aveti nevoie de mii de conversii pe secunta, cred ca AutoMapper este o solutie foarte buna. Obtinem un cod mai usor de intretinut si mult mai clar.


Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…