Skip to main content

Config class to XML

Nu de mult m-am jucat cu un feature de la Castle Project care permite persistarea fișierelor de configurare sub forma unor fisiere XML. Solutia data de ei este foarte usor de folosit. Daca combinam si cu Ioc oferit de Castle Project atunci metoda de persistare a datelor este aproape perfecta.
Si totusi, exista momente cand nu avem nevoie nevoie de o solutie atat de complexa. Dorim sa salvam intr-un fisiere de configurare doar cateva date pe care apoi sa le putem incarca. Am putea folosii app setings, in care putem pune in format key/value oricate date, dar nu recomand. Avem la indemana o solutie mult mai simpla si care ne ofer acces la date printr-un mecanism mult mai sigur.
Daca ne aducem aminte, exista o clasa numita XmlSerializer, de care uitam ca exista. Cu ajutorul ei putem sa serializam si sa deserializam obiecte.
Iata si o parte din codul care serializeaza si deserializa un obiect intr-un string:
        /// <summary>
/// Serializeaza obiectul data in format xml ca si un string.
/// </summary>
private string SerializeToXMLString<T>(object obj)
where T : class
{
using (MemoryStream mem = new MemoryStream())
{
new XmlSerializer(obj.GetType()).Serialize(mem,obj);
return new ASCIIEncoding().GetString(mem.ToArray());
}
}

/// <summary>
/// Deserializeaza obiectul dintr-un string in format XML intr-un obiect.
/// </summary>
private T DeSerializeFromXMLString<T>(string xmlString)
where T:class
{
byte[] bytes = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(xmlString);
using (MemoryStream mem = new MemoryStream(bytes))
{
return (T)new XmlSerializer(typeof (T)).Deserialize(mem);
}
}

Se poate scrie un API pe langa aceasta care sa incarce sau sa salveze obiectul dintr-un fisier dat.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too