Skip to main content

Should I use Azure Monitoring or Azure Service Health?

By
In this post, we will try to respond to a simple question:

Should I use Azure Monitoring or Azure Service Health?

It is important to emphasise that there is no overlap of the features that each service is offering.

  1. Azure Service Health: inform us about outages or planned maintenance on Azure Services that we are using
  2. Azure Monitoring: inform us about how our application performs and provides us with information to identify and track issues inside our app.

In a standard scenario, we need both services during the operation phases. One service is providing us with information related to the current health status of Azure Services that we are using. The other one offers us insights related to our application insights.

Azure Monitoring
Using Azure Monitoring, we can collect, analyse and react based on information that we collect from Azure Services, applications or any other systems that are involved. The no. of data sources supported by Azure Monitoring is vast and includes:
  • Application
  • Operation System
  • Azure Subscription
  • Azure Resources
  • Azure Tenant
  • On-premises data sources
  • Custom sources
One of the most significant benefits of Azure Monitoring is the capability to aggregate metrics, logs and audit from multiple sources and consolidate them in one central location. From it, we can run queries and drill down inside issues.
Even if Azure Monitoring has a powerful dashboard, we should remember that it is well integrated with other systems. In this way, Azure Monitoring can become easilty a data source for PowerBI or for Workbooks.

Azure Health
It's the source of truth when you want to know if a specific Azure Service that you are using has health issues or when planned maintenance takes place. When one of Azure Services that you are using has health problems, the Azure Health will notify you.
You might say that this is an overlap with Azure Status dashboard, where you can see the current status of all Azure Services cross the globe. The difference is that inside Azure Health you see the outages, health issues and maintenance events that are affecting you.

The power of alerts
Both services that were covered in this post support alert notification. Using alerts we can create the notification system that would allow our operation team to get notifications related to health issues of Azure Services that we are using or issues of our application and system automatically.
Additional to this, notifications can trigger auto-scaling actions or custom flows that can execute disaster recovery or any other actions.

Conclusion
The combination of these two services enables the operation team to have the right tool to monitor and react for any kind of incident. Root cause analyzes can be done fast by consolidating these two services.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

By
In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

By
In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...
Post a Comment
Read more

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

By
Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...
8 comments
Read more