Skip to main content

Azure Storage authentication using Azure AD

By
Cloud and Azure became a complex environment, with a high number of services and things that you need to take into account. Even so, you still use the base services in the day to day work like Azure VMs, Storage or Network capacities.
Azure Storage it is one of the most used services inside Microsoft Azure directly or indirectly. Any other services that are running inside the cloud need this services to be able to store or work with data.
Until now, access control to Azure was possible using Key Accounts or Shared Access Signatures (SAS). The combination of this two is powerful and can cover most of the scenarios of small and mid-size companies.
Issues appear for enterprise customers, where (Azure) Active Directory is part of their core services. For them, access management to Azure Storage is crucial to be controlled using AD. Especially for an organization where there are 10.000 employees or more, sharing access to resources using SAS tokens is possible, but adds extra complexity to the system. The problems appear in the moment when you need to remove access to specific storage, where things are not so straightforward when you use Shared Access Signatures or Shared Access Policies.

In the second quarter of this year, Azure team announced the support of Azure AD authentification and authorization for Azure Storage. These give us the perfect mechanism to be able to control access to data using a consolidated solution over all the organization. It enables IT team to be able to remove or allow access to Azure Storage content on the fly, based on user roles.
This new feature in combination with Manage Service Identify (MSI) allows teams to assign specific AD roles to application and services that are running on top of Azure, not only to people. In this way, even at the application layer, we can have granular access control to Azure Storage content.
Behind the scene, a request is made to Azure AD using OAuth 2.0 protocol. The Azure AD provides an access token to the application that can be used to access Azure Storage. The first thing that needs to be done is to configure Azure Storage RBAC to enable access to a security principal, specifying what you want to access and permissions rights.
The full configuration flow can be a little complex because involves creating and registering an Azure AD Application and grand access to Azure Storage, but the process is well documented and is straightforward.

Things that you shall consider:
  1. At this moment the service is available only for Blob storage and Queues
  2. The Storage Account needs to be created using Resource Management model
  3. Custom RBAC roles are supported
  4. Access control can be controlled at container and queue level (at blob level it is not recommended)

Being in preview the following limitations exist:
  1. Page blobs access for premium storage it is not yet available
  2. Logging information for Azure Storage Analytics it is not yet supported

This great new feature allows us to integrate and manage storage access in a centralized location, together with all other systems that are using Azure AD.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

By
In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

By
In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...
Post a Comment
Read more

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

By
Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...
8 comments
Read more