Skip to main content

Azure Blob Storage Life-cycle Management

By
In this post, we will talk about a mechanism how we can move data from Azure Storage from one tier to another.

Business needs
Nowadays, Azure is more than a location where you scale your processing power. Slowly, Azure becomes a location where you store your data, including audit data for 2-5 or even 15 years.

 Problem
Initially, you have warm data, that needs to be often accessed, for example, audit data for the last 30 days. After a while, this data is becoming cooler, and you don't need to access so often.
Azure Storage has at this moment three different types of tiers (Archive, Cool, Hot) that offers different access speed, but also at the same time, the price is different. For example the storage price between Hot and Archive is 10x different.

 Current solution
At this moment even if you have all these three tiers, you had to do the chancing manually. It means that you had to create an automation mechanism that can decide if a specific content/blob can be retired and to do the actual tier change of the storage.
It involves custom development that of course comes with extra costs from running and maintenance perspective.

 Lifecycles Management
A new feature of Azure Storage is allowing us to define a custom policy that can move data from one tier to another or execute custom actions. A policy is applied automatically for all blobs that respect a specific rule at the blob level (under a particular container).
For example from a simple policy, we can specify that all blobs under a specific Azure Storage to be kept on the Hot tier for 90 days, moves to Cool storage for the next 180 days and kept for the next 5 years on Archive tier. After this period the content can be automatically removed.



In the below example we define a policy that is applicable for all blobs that have prefix 'autditlogs'  or 'auditdata' with the rules that were specified in the previous paragraph. 

{
  "version": "0.5",
  "rules": [ 
    {
      "name": "auditPolicy", 
      "type": "Lifecycle", 
      "definition": {
        "filters": {
          "blobTypes": [ "blockBlob" ],
          "prefixMatch": [ "auditlogs" , "auditdata" ]
        },
        "actions": {
          "baseBlob": {
            "tierToCool": { "daysAfterModificationGreaterThan": 90 },
            "tierToArchive": { "daysAfterModificationGreaterThan": 180 },
            "delete": { "daysAfterModificationGreaterThan": 2555 }
          },
          "snapshot": {
            "delete": { "daysAfterCreationGreaterThan": 2555 }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Things that you need to consider
When you need to apply a rule immediately, you need to set the number of days to 0 (ZERO).

The below constraints are only for the preview phase. Things might change once it will be in GA.

  1. Only 'blockBlobs' are supported for now
  2. Snapshots cannot be moved from one tier to another. Only delete operations are supported on base blob and on snapshot also
  3. The condition values that are supported are age from last modification or from the creation date

Conclusion
The lifecycle management feature can be seen as a small change, but behind the scene, Azure is closer to enterprise needs and requirements. In this context, being able to define such policies can be a money saver not only from storage cost but also from management cost.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Database Modernization Matters for AI

By
  When companies transition to the cloud, they typically begin with applications and virtual machines, which is often the easier part of the process. The actual complexity arises later when databases are moved. To save time and effort, cloud adoption is more of a cloud migration in an IaaS manner, fulfilling current, but not future needs. Even organisations that are already in the cloud find that their databases, although “migrated,” are not genuinely modernised. This disparity becomes particularly evident when they begin to explore AI technologies. Understanding Modernisation Beyond Migration Database modernisation is distinct from merely relocating an outdated database to Azure. It's about making your data layer ready for future needs, like automation, real-time analytics, and AI capabilities. AI needs high throughput, which can be achieved using native DB cloud capabilities. When your database runs in a traditional setup (even hosted in the cloud), in that case, you will enc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

By
The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

By
Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...
Post a Comment
Read more