Skip to main content

Azure Blob Storage Life-cycle Management

In this post, we will talk about a mechanism how we can move data from Azure Storage from one tier to another.

Business needs
Nowadays, Azure is more than a location where you scale your processing power. Slowly, Azure becomes a location where you store your data, including audit data for 2-5 or even 15 years.

Problem
Initially, you have warm data, that needs to be often accessed, for example, audit data for the last 30 days. After a while, this data is becoming cooler, and you don't need to access so often.
Azure Storage has at this moment three different types of tiers (Archive, Cool, Hot) that offers different access speed, but also at the same time, the price is different. For example the storage price between Hot and Archive is 10x different.

Current solution
At this moment even if you have all these three tiers, you had to do the chancing manually. It means that you had to create an automation mechanism that can decide if a specific content/blob can be retired and to do the actual tier change of the storage.
It involves custom development that of course comes with extra costs from running and maintenance perspective.

Lifecycles Management
A new feature of Azure Storage is allowing us to define a custom policy that can move data from one tier to another or execute custom actions. A policy is applied automatically for all blobs that respect a specific rule at the blob level (under a particular container).
For example from a simple policy, we can specify that all blobs under a specific Azure Storage to be kept on the Hot tier for 90 days, moves to Cool storage for the next 180 days and kept for the next 5 years on Archive tier. After this period the content can be automatically removed.



In the below example we define a policy that is applicable for all blobs that have prefix 'autditlogs'  or 'auditdata' with the rules that were specified in the previous paragraph. 

{
  "version": "0.5",
  "rules": [ 
    {
      "name": "auditPolicy", 
      "type": "Lifecycle", 
      "definition": {
        "filters": {
          "blobTypes": [ "blockBlob" ],
          "prefixMatch": [ "auditlogs" , "auditdata" ]
        },
        "actions": {
          "baseBlob": {
            "tierToCool": { "daysAfterModificationGreaterThan": 90 },
            "tierToArchive": { "daysAfterModificationGreaterThan": 180 },
            "delete": { "daysAfterModificationGreaterThan": 2555 }
          },
          "snapshot": {
            "delete": { "daysAfterCreationGreaterThan": 2555 }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  ]
}

Things that you need to consider
When you need to apply a rule immediately, you need to set the number of days to 0 (ZERO).

The below constraints are only for the preview phase. Things might change once it will be in GA.

  1. Only 'blockBlobs' are supported for now
  2. Snapshots cannot be moved from one tier to another. Only delete operations are supported on base blob and on snapshot also
  3. The condition values that are supported are age from last modification or from the creation date

Conclusion
The lifecycle management feature can be seen as a small change, but behind the scene, Azure is closer to enterprise needs and requirements. In this context, being able to define such policies can be a money saver not only from storage cost but also from management cost.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provi...