Skip to main content

Microservices and Team Setup - Is not only about code

Solutions that are based on microservices architecture become a commodity. Teams are not afraid anymore when they found out that the next projects is based on micro-service architecture.
The transition from messaging base architecture to microservices architectures was very useful for team to understand the main concept and how a solution should look like. 

Trigger
Working with different frameworks or tools specific to microservices will make the team curious and happy at the beginning. Most of the people are happy when they have team allocated to learn new stuff. But after this phase, I identify that there is usually a collapse. In the first moment when we are ready to start 'production' code, people starts to have hiccups and each of them have problems when they need to make a deploy, run their code in containers and so on.

Cause
It is easily to forgot or to ignore that microservices is not only at service/code level. It is also at infrastructure level. There is a lot of scripting and automation that needs to be done to be have a success story. 
Even testing your own code is not so easy anymore. You microservice will need to run in a sandbox or you need also the services around you own service to be able to do the integration tests. 

Effect
Most of the team members are fighting with deployments, where the service should run, how to setup environments, trying to write some deployments scrips and so on. There focus is not anymore on writing the business logic that shall run in the services themselves, but on the infrastructure part. They happens usually in a disorganized way, each person is looking for the same stuff, looking in the right place and many more. 

Key People
In such teams, there is a high need of DevOps and people that need to think and prepare environment and how deployments will work before the development team start they job. 

Solution
From the 0 day of the projects, you shall be aware that configuration and infrastructure part of such solution will be different from the other type of applications. You'll need people allocated on this part, that should support the team when they had problems. 
The need of a scrips that allow development team to create the environment that they need is high and can be a time-saver.

Conclusion
In any projects, you shall never forget or neglect this kind of things. 
Sharing is everything, but also specialization is important. Each member shall focus on the thing that they are the champions and you need champions for each item.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

Scope
The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

Context
First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…