This post comes as an observation on what is happening
around us, in so called ‘Corporates’. I just realize that there will be more
than one posts. There are many ideas and notes, that I want to treat them
separately.
Before going further, I would like to mention that this post
doesn’t have a connection with the company that I work for. It is only the
output of different discussions that I had with friends that work
around the globe for different ‘Corporates’.
Why I’m using ‘Corporate’ with ‘ ‘?
These companies are usually under 1.000 people and try to
play like a ‘Corporate’, but in reality they are not ready for something
like this. They have complex process and don’t care to optimize them. They
forget that behind a process is one or more person that will run it and a
process needs to add structure, clarity and repeatability – not only power and
control. For a ‘Corporate’ like this, an external audit or an external opinion
from a consultant is not acceptable, is too expensive and might damage the
revenue, by adding extra costs.
It is important to remember that not all companies are like
this. I discovered (and still discovering) great companies, that yes, are truly
a corp., but at the same time you don’t feel them like this. Even if they have
processes, different communication paths and a complex structure, behind them
you find people that share the same goals or the same vision (but from
different perspective).
Imagine that you need to pre-order the lunch for workshop.
You know that someone from the attendees is vegan. At the same time, you are
aware that the current supplier(s) doesn’t have a vegan menu. In a so called
‘Corporate’, even if you reach a person, not only the web interface of a
request form, you will find out:
- Sorry, the current supplier doesn’t have a vegan menu and the company standard doesn’t allow us to order from other external provider(s).
A response like this is not useful and you will not have too many options. Well, there will be no option for you in such a case.
Yes, it is true that the current process and company
standards doesn’t allow you to order from another provider, but we need to
remember that in general a process is applicable in most cases (let’s say,
99%), but there are exceptional cases that needs to be treated separately. You
might even realize that you could find solutions for different problems by
respecting the process 100% - but with the support of a person, not only from
the web form.
You might find out:
- Unfortunately, we are not allowed to order from other provider. Let me check if I can order more fruits and salads. In this way, we might be okay.
Yes, this is not the perfect solution, but it is a better
solution, than nothing.
Or even better:
- Unfortunately, we are not allowed to order from other provider. Let’s me check if I can order more fruits and salads. In this way, we might be okay. Also, I will discuss with the process owner or with the suppliers owner to see if we can improve the current setup and to avoid such situations in the near future. I will follow-up with you related to this topic once I have updates.
Even if we have the same response with a hot-fix for the
current solution, there is also something more. Someone is ready to help us and
see what we can change (if is necessary) to avoid this kind of situations.
Should we change the current process for an exception
Of course, we should not change flows and processes, for
each exception. But we need to be aware if we need to improve or change current
processes. We are living in a world that changes every second. It is impossible
to assume that a thing that is applicable NOW, will be also applicable in 2 or
3 years.
This is why it is important to be aware and try to get
feedback related to current processes and needs. Simple solutions, like
offering a preferred (recommended) list of suppliers, but also allow other
suppliers to be used as long as some company standards are respected are
enough. In most cases people will use the standard suppliers.
Conclusion: Don’t forget to CARE
In situation like this, the thing that is the most important
in my perspective is people. They need to CARE. They need to care about others,
they need to care about what you want to do and they should be open to help you. On top of this,
they should CARE about the current PROCESSES and STANDARDS and are ready to improve
them when necessary.
The worst case where you can end up is with a company or
group of people that don’t care anymore. They don’t care about the real needs
and the others. They look and see only the process and company standards. With
a team like this, I’m pretty sure that you will end up with a lot of
frustration, unhappy people that will leave the company OR they will not care
anymore also.
Don’t forget to CARE and HELP others. In the end we have
the same purpose.
Comments
Post a Comment