Skip to main content

Azure Development Environment - Event Hub and Throughput Units

Very often, the cloud services that are cheap are the one that will be the most expensive one at the end of the month. Not because there are hidden costs, but because people tend to use them without caring of costs - they say that are cheap and the price is low.
Making a review to the last bill of the development subscription I notified that 25% of the costs of the bill are generated by Service Bus - more exactly by Event Hub.

Event Hub
Why this is happening? Each developer is using one or two instances of Event Hub to develop, test and validate different flows. Our scripts, that are generating instances of Event Hub will crease a new namespace for each new instance of Event Hub.
In this context, for a team of 7 developers, you will end up with 14 different Event Hubs and Service Bus Namespaces. On top of this, you will have different environments, like DEV and TEST environment that will add another 3 or 4 instance of Event Hubs.
In the end you can end up with 18 different Event Hubs, each instance will have his own namespace and Throughput Unit.

The cost of a Throughput Unit (TU) per month is around 22$ for the Standard tier.
18TU x 22$ = 396$/mo
Nice, almost 400$, only for TU.

Keep in mind
Before describing each solution that could help us optimize the cost, we need to remember that if you implement a solution, it should have a low impact on development team. This means that you don't want to make the DEV life a hell, because you decided to reduce some costs.
If might cost you more the time that DEV team lose by sharing the same Event Hub or implement another solution that optimize costs than the TH cost itself.

Possible Solution
It might be possible for each DEV to use only one Event Hub and have multiple Consumer Groups. This solution is not only complex, but will not be 1 to 1 to the real environment and can be buggy.
I would try to avoid as much as possible a solution like this.
Use Basic Tier
The cost difference between Standard and Basic tier is 50% per TU (Basic is 11$/mo, Standard is 22$/mo). The problem with the Basic tier is from the functionality that is available, like Publisher Policies or the number of Consumer Groups.
The one that might create the biggest problem is the limited number of Consumer Groups. For nasic tier you can have only one, the default one - $Default. This default Consumer Group cannot be renamed or deleted. If you need a custom name of the Consumer Group you will not be able to use the Basic tier.
Because we are using custom name for Consumer Groups, we cannot use this solution without changing the deployment and creation script.
Clean the Event Hub every day
This solution would involve that each day, to delete all the DEV instances of Event Hub and in the morning to recreate it. The price of TU is per hour so you might be able to reduce the cost with maximum 50%.
From my past experience I would say that you will be able to reduce the cost only with 33%. Why? Because people might come at 8AM, others might leave at 8PM. So you will need around 16 hours when the resources is up and running.
From the DEV perspective, you will need a script to clean and recreate resources and also to push the access configuration to their environments.  This might be a hell, creating a to complex and buggy DEV env. that will cost you more and will not be loved by the DEV team.
I wouldn't try to implement such a solution.

Even if we identified different solutions that might help us to reduce the cost of the bill, we need to decide if worth it or not to optimize the cost.
Personally, I wouldn't do any change related to this and I would prefer to pay more on Azure bill, but have a simple and clear DEV environment, that is easy to use.


Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…