Skip to main content

Azure Service Fabric - Actors and Reminders execution order

The main topic of this post is the order execution of requests that are coming to a Reliable Actor of Azure Service Fabric.

Actor and Single-Thread
Of the most important characteristic of an Actor is that is single-thread. This means that if you have 3 different requests that are coming to the Actor, the actor will execute them one at a time.
As we can see in the above example, while the actor execute the first request, it will not start executing the second request. All the requests will be added to an 'execution queue'. In this way, there will be only one thread executing in the same time on an actor.
This is why, all the functionality that is exposed by an actor is asynchronous and should all the time have a cancellation token. We might have cases when we want to cancel a request because of a timeout or other causes.

Reminders
On top of this we have Timers and Reminders that are used in combination with an Actor when we want to execute a specific action after a period of time. For example we have an actor that checks every 10 minutes if new content is available for him or we can have another actor that checks every 12 hours if the commands that are stored by him are expired or not.

Execution order
Now, in combination with the execution flows, comes the big question. If we already have Request 2 and Request 3 in the 'execution queue', when our reminder will be executed?

We might have a clean-up or check action that needs to execute every 10 minutes. If Request 2 and 3 takes to much, we might end up executing the Reminder action to late.

It is important to know that the priority of an action triggered by a Reminder is higher than a normal Request that arrives to an actor. Because of this, the Reminder action is executed immediately after the current request.

This means that even if we have Request 2 and Request 3 in the 'execution queue', the Reminder action will be executed once the Request 1 ends. Even if Request 2 and 3 arrived before the Reminder action, the Reminder will have a higher priority.

Conclusion
It is important to remember that:

  • Each request (action) is executed one at a time
  • If actor is executing another action, the second action will be putted in a queue until the first action is executed
  • The action that is triggered by a reminder will be putted in the 'execution queue' with a higher priority

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...