Skip to main content

SQL Azure - Improve restoring time of BACPAC during load tests

SQL Azure is a great service when you need a location to store a relational database and you don't want to manage the infrastructure that is behind it. In only a few minutes, you can get a powerful database ready for your needs.

In almost all projects life cycles, there is a moment in time when need to run one or more Load Tests. For each scenario, you may need a different database setup.
In the above example, we have 3 different scenarios that we want to test. This means that, we need to load 3 different bacpac files. If the database is relatively small (10MB) than we will not have any kind of problems.
But with a large database, the restoring process can take some time. Behind the scene, a database restoring process is complex and CPU intensive, because of this it will require time and CPU.
This will not be a problem for a database of type P1 or P2, where the restoring process is fast. But, for a S0 or S1, we may need to wait for even a few hours, until our backup is restored and our database is ready to run another load test scenario.

What we could do in this case? What we can do to reduce the waiting time between Load Tests?
Better databases
One possible solution would be to upgrade our database to a better one. Unfortunately this is not a solution. When you run a load test you want to run with the same configuration like in production. Running with a better database may affect your load tests results.

Different databases
Another solution is to prepare multiple databases, with different configuration. In this way you can have for each scenario a different database instance. From your application you could specify what database you want to use.
This could work for small/medium solutions. But this could increase the load test setup if your system use 15 different databases for example. Also, the costs of running the load tests may be impacted.

Better databases only when we restore a bacpac
Using this approach, we would run the load test with the database type that we want. Only during the load test setup, we would upgrade our database instance to a better type. In this way we can minimize the time that is needed to restore a specific bacpac and we would also reduce the costs of the load tests.

It is important to know that changing the type of a database takes only a few minutes. In this way we can easily play with different types.

In conclusion we could say that the best approach in this situation is to use the same database, but to change the type of the database when a database restore is done. This would allow us to keep the time and the costs to minimal and well-balanced.


Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

[Post-Event] Codecamp Conference Cluj-Napoca - Nov 19, 2016

Last day I was invited to another Codecamp Conference, that took place in Cluj-Napoca. Like other Codecamp Conferences, the event was very big, with more than 1.000 participants and 70 sessions. There were 10 tracks in parallel, so it was pretty hard to decide at  what session you want to join.
It was great to join this conference and I hope that you discovered something new during the conference.
At this event I talked about Azure IoT Hub and how we can use it to connect devices from the field. I had a lot of demos using Raspberry PI 3 and Simplelink SensorTag. Most of the samples were written in C++ and Node.JS and people were impressed that even if we are using Microsoft technologies, we are not limited to C# and .NET. World and Microsoft are changing so fast. Just looking and Azure IoT Hub and new features that were launched and I'm pressed (Jobs, Methods, Device Twin).
On backend my demos covered Stream Analytics, Event Hub, Azure Object Storage and DocumentDB.

What abo…