Skip to main content

Azure Storage - Client Side Encryption

A few days ago, client-side encryption for Azure Storage was announced. In this post we will take a look over this feature.

First of all, you should know that the encryption/decryption takes place on client side. This means, that the content will be already encryption when it will arrive on Azure. This encryption technique is called Envelop Technique. It is very useful when you want to add another security layer over your data.
Out of the box, there are client library for .NET (including Windows Phone). For other languages, like Java is not yet supported, but because the encryption algorithm is a well know one, you may be able to implement it on other platforms also.

The encryption algorithm that is used by client library is AES (Advanced Encryption Standard). It is important to know that the encryption keys are generated by the client library. And is NEVER stored in Azure Storage. The encryption key should be stored in a different location. This library is full integration with Key Vault Service, that allow us to persist the keys in a safe location.

The encryption mechanism is not complicated, but is very useful. You don't need to encrypt by yourself, using different libraries and orchestrate all the activities. From a developer perspective, the life is more simple and the chances to introduce a bug are reduced.

There are some small things that we should consider when using this library.
First thing is related to blobs. All reads and writes operations needs to be made on the entire blob content. This means that we should not upload encrypted content using PutBlock. All the time, we should use DownloadToXXX, BlobReadStreamXXX, UploadFromXXX and OpenWriteXXX.
This is necessary because each time when you upload content, a new IV (Initialization Vector) is generated. This information is stored in blob metadata and will be used during decryption.
A similar situation is on Azure Tables. We have full support for action like Insert and Replace, but Merging is not supported.
The interesting thing is when we are using Azure Queue and we want to encrypt content. In this situation, the encryption information (IV and a random CEK) are added to each message. This means that we can work separately with each message. Take into account that for each message, the message body will contain also the IV and CEK. Because of this the size of the message and queue will be bigger.

In the below diagram, we can see where the encryption metadata are stored (IV, CEK).


If you want to enforce to encryption all the content that is stored in Azure Storage, you can set the 'RequireEncryption' to TRUE. In this way, you will enforce the client to encrypt all the content that is send. If you want to take a look over the implementation you can see the source code on GitHub - https://github.com/Azure/azure-storage-net/blob/master/Lib/ClassLibraryCommon/Blob/BlobEncryptionPolicy.cs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see