Skip to main content

Updating content of messages from Azure Queues

In the era of microservices and cloud, applications contain more and more components and sub-components that are design to do only one thing. All this components needs to communicate between each other in a fast and reliable way.
For communication purpose, different messaging solutions are used. Nowadays, a Enterprise Service Bus solution like Azure Services Bus Topic or BizTalk is normal. For more simple problems, one or more queues can be enough (Azure Storage Queue)

Almost all messaging system allow us to consume messages using Peek and Lock pattern. This allow us to take a message from the queue, lock it for a specific time, process it and at the end, if we are able to process it with success to remove it from the queue. During this time, the message is hidden from others consumers and cannot be peeked by others. After a specific time interval if we don't mark the message as consumed the message will be available in the queue for consuming.

But what should we do when we have a long running processing task, that can take 20 minutes or 1 hour. The most simple solution would be to split the task in subtasks - when is possible.
This means that we would have multiple sub-components that needs to communicate between each other. We would end up with multiple queues or with an enterprise service bus system like Azure Service Bus Topic.


But what should we do when we cannot split it? Or the complexity of splitting in subtasks is so high that it not worth it... and even if we would be able to split it in subtasks, we would end up with something similar like a 'state machine'. This state would be used to know the current status of the tasks and would allow us to be able to continue from the last step. For this case, it would be nice to be able to update the content of a message that is the queue without having to remove the original message.

For long running tasks this could be very useful. We could update the current progress/status of task in the queue, without having to use a storage for this. This can be done very simple if we are using Azure Storage Queue. This queue system allow us to update an existing message that is the queue. See below code:
CloudQueue queue = queueClient. GetQueueReference("fooqueue");

CloudQueueMessage message = queue.GetMessage(new TimeSpan(0,0,10);
String newMessageContent = message + " new message content";
message.SetMessageContent(message);

queue.UpdateMessage(message, MessageUpdateField.Content);
We can use this feature each time when we need to update the progress of a task that was triggered by a message in the queue. Beside the content we can update any other fields of the message (for example the visibility property).

In this post we saw how simple is to update the content of a message from a queue without having to remove and recreate it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

What to do when you hit the throughput limits of Azure Storage (Blobs)

In this post we will talk about how we can detect when we hit a throughput limit of Azure Storage and what we can do in that moment. Context If we take a look on Scalability Targets of Azure Storage ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-scalability-targets/ ) we will observe that the limits are prety high. But, based on our business logic we can end up at this limits. If you create a system that is hitted by a high number of device, you can hit easily the total number of requests rate that can be done on a Storage Account. This limits on Azure is 20.000 IOPS (entities or messages per second) where (and this is very important) the size of the request is 1KB. Normally, if you make a load tests where 20.000 clients will hit different blobs storages from the same Azure Storage Account, this limits can be reached. How we can detect this problem? From client, we can detect that this limits was reached based on the HTTP error code that is returned by HTTP