Skip to main content

Scale Units and Cloud

In this post we will talk about what is a scale unit and what are the benefits of scale unit concept when we are working with a system that is running in a cloud environment.
What is a scale unit?
We can see a scale unit as a group of resources that are grouped together to serve a specific number of clients or requests.  This scale unit has a ‘common’ configuration that specifies the resources that are needed by a scale unit.
Let’s assume that we have a scale unit that contains:

  • 2 Azure SQL
  • 4 Service Bus Namespaces (with 100 Queues per namespace)
  • 8 Worker Roles
  • 3 Web Roles
  • 2 Different storage accounts

Having all of them grouped together we can test the environment at a specific scale. Otherwise we could try to scale our system infinitely, but all of us knows that this is not possible. All the resources under the same scale unit work together for the same purpose.
Each scale unit serve a specific number of clients (or resources). Because the scale unit is fixed we can know exactly what is the throughput of our scale unit - number of requests per second, number of messages that can be consumed, number of access at storage and so on.
In the end we will know exactly the number of clients that we can server or manage for each scale unit and the cost of a scale unit.
Scaling can be made easily without affecting the performance of the system, by adding new units each time.
This means that we scale very easily, by adding new scale units. For each scale unit we know exactly what are the costs. In this way we can estimate the cost easily.
The hardest thing is to separate all each scale units. Between each scale unit we should not have any kind of communication or a central node (a master one). This is the hardest thing to accomplish, because large systems are very complex with a lot of dependencies.
I think that scale unit can help us to be able to predict the necessary request and to scale in a safe way.


In the above example we can see to instances of our scale unit. Each scale unit is mapped to a specific scale unit. There is no communication between scale unit. Each scale unit can be hosted in the same data centers or in different data centers, based on our needs.

In the future, with the new portal. we will be able very easily to create the provisioning for a scale unit and control the provisioning with a few clicks. Azure V2 will allow us to define a JSON file that can be used to provision all the components from our scale unit and connected between them, without having to specify the storage account name and key to the worker roles that need this information (we will be able to do this using a script).

In the next post we will try to see how we map a system that requires 'some' communication between scale units.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...