Skip to main content

Manage bearer token when we scale on more than one server - OWIN, Katana, AngularJS

In this post we will talk about bearer token authentication and how we should manage this token when our application is running on more than one server -  when we are using OWIN, Katana and AngularJS.

Token Characteristics
First of all let’s see what are the characteristics of bearer token:
  • Generate by server
  • Contains user claims (what kind of operations a user can do/roles)
  • All information that a token contains are encrypted
  • Token information can be decrypted only by the machine that created the token
  • Expiration date is encrypted in the token itself
  • No token information are stored on the server side
  • Encryption is safe enough to be used worldwide (Facebook, Google and Twitter are using it) 
  • A token can be used by external system only when decryption key is shared
  • Easy and cheap to generate tokens
Why?
All this sounds good, but what is happening if we want to go in production. In this case we should be able to scale our backend from one node to 3 or 10 nodes.
Do we need stick connection?... to be able to redirect all the request from the same client to the same instance (because token can be decrypted only by the machine that generate the key)
NO, we don’t need this.

How?
To be able to allow other instances or servers to decrypt and access token information we need to set the machine key. This can be configured directly in the web.config. Once this configuration is done all the encryption/decryption by that application will be use them.

In the system.web section of our configuration file we need to specify the machine key node. We need to specify the validation key, decryption key and what kind of validation and decryption mechanism we want to use.
  <system.web>
    <compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.5" />
    <httpRuntime targetFramework="4.5" />
    <machineKey validationKey="BDE5239FBD71982481D87D815FA0A65B9F5982D99DFA96E6D92B782E0952D58818B479B19FF6D95263E85B0209297E6858B57D1E0BD3EFECE5E35742D605F2A7"
              decryptionKey="8E8496D7342EA258526CF6177E04EA7D208E359C95E60CD2A462FC062B9E41B3"
              validation="SHA1"
              decryption="AES"/>
  </system.web>
Be aware, don’t use this keys, you should generate your own keys, otherwise "I" will be able to decrypt your token also.
For ISS, the machine key and validation key can be generated easily using ISS features (https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755177(v=ws.10).aspx) or we can use PowerShell (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2915218#AppendixA)

Conclusion
In conclusion we saw that it is not complicated to 'connect’ multiple application instances to use and access the same token but we need to be able to share the machine key between them.
Another option is to have a dedicate machine that manage and validate token, but this is another story.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...