Skip to main content

When we should (not) use Azure Virtual Networks

In today post I would like to talk about Azure Virtual Network and when we should use them.
Before starting, let’s see what a virtual network is. Virtual Networks give us the possibility to create a private network in Azure, where we can manage our own devices and machines. This network will has his own IP, DNS and custom configuration. This kind of private networks can add an additionally later of security in our solution because only resources from the same Virtual Network can see each other. Base on this we could say that we are creating own isolated islands, with their own topology (or course if needed, we add also on-premises resources – creating a hybrid network).
It is important to remember that in a Virtual Network we can have any kind or resources from PaaS to IaaS. For example we can have VMs combined with some worker roles and Azure SQL Services. All in the same Virtual Network.
In this moment we made an overview idea about what is a Virtual Network. Next I would like to look together with you over some use cases when this time or network can be useful or not.


Hybrid Solutions (Yes)
This scenario is the most classic one for Virtual Networks. In this cases it is a have to use this kind of network to connect your Azure resources (VMs for example) to your on-premises network. This is the only way if you want resources from on-premises and Azure to be in the same network.
Direct communication between Azure resources (Yes)
There are scenarios when you want a direct communication between Azure resources. In the case when you need Azure resources to be in the same network, isolated from the rest of Azure resources, Virtual Network can be used with success. In this way you will be able to establish a direct connection with resources that are in the same Virtual Network.

Customer Customers Devices (No)
These specific scenario should not use Virtual Networks because of security issues that can appear. Imagine that you develop a Smart Home Automation platform that can be used by clients to make their houses extremely smart. You would have a lot of on-premises devices that needs to communicate in a safe and reliable way with your backend.
One idea is to add all on-premises resources from all your clients under the same Virtual Network. This could be a good idea at first, but if you think again and review this solution you could realize that is not the best approach. In this use case, all your clients devices will be in the same network, this mean that they will be able to reach (over TCP/IP packages), devices that are own by other clients. This could be a big security hale – you don’t want to end up that someone else to control your house.


Secure communication (Yes)
Imagine that you have VMs on Azure that needs to communicate only between them. You don’t want to allow other resources to reach them. In this case a virtual network can be used with success isolate and control what data can go in/our from this network.

Conclusion
Virtual Networks can be used with success when we want to add enable direct communication between different devices that are on Azure or Azure and on-premises. This feature should be used with attention, especially when we are dealing with resources of different client. We need to make sure that it is allowed that different customer resources to be in the same network.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too