Skip to main content

Multiple Staging Deployment of Azure Web Sites using Slots

How are you dealing the website management before going live with a new version? I have in mind different environments like production, testing, integration, development, persist the old version of the web site into a location that give you possibility to swap between the new one and old one if you have issues.


If you are using Azure Websites you will discover a new feature that gives you the possibility to have multiple staging environments live in the same time. Switching between them is done in real time. Before going further, you should know two things. One, we are not referring to staging environment, this is something more that staging and this feature is available only for Standard plan.
From now, you can deploy a new version of your web site into a separate slot, that is isolated 100% from the production one. There you can test how it’s behave, performance issues and so on. You can have as many slots as you want, each slot is accessible using a unique URL. Anytime, you can switch between them, putting another slot in production (swap). When a swap is done, the web site that was in production will replace the slot with is going in production. The mechanism is pretty simple, because in your slots, the websites are already loaded, resources allocated and so on. Only the DNS is changed. In this way the downtime is eliminated and no requests are dropped.
If during a SWAP something bad is happening and an error occurs, Azure will make automatically a rollback and the original version will be restored.
Be aware, you will pay for each slot that you have, like a normal website. For example if you have 2 slots (INT and TESTING) and another slot that is live, that you will pay 3 X Standard Web Sites.
When you create a new slot, you have the possibility to clone the configuration also. This is a pretty nice feature, especially when you have custom configuration in place. When you make s swap between slots the fallowing information will change:

  • Connection strings
  • General, Diagnostic and Monitoring setting
  • Handler Mapping

Also, there are other configuration that are not changed when you make a swap:

  • Publishing endpoints
  • Scale settings
  • Custom Domain Name
  • Bindings and SSL Certificates

I really like that scale settings are not swap between instances. In this way, we can have in slots normal configuration (one instance of our websites) and in production to have 10 or 20, based on our needs. Don’t forget that database connection string is changed when a swap is made. Because of this you need to change the one from slot to the production one before making a swap.
If you want to find more about this please visit http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/web-sites-staged-publishing/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...