Skip to main content

[Code refactoring] Multiple Threads - Locks and Mutex

Each of us know what is lock and what its purpose is. It is used to block a critical section of code – the statements from the lock block will be executed only by one thread at the same time.
public class Foo
{
  FooConnection con;
  
  public void OpenConnection()
  {
    ...
    con.Open();
  }

  public void CloseConnection()
  {
    ...
    con.Close();    
  }

  public void Write(...)
  {
    ...
    con.Write(...);
  }
  
  public object Read()
  {
    ...
    ... con.Read();
    ...
  }
}

...
Foo foo = ...;
foo.OpenConnection();
foo.Read();
foo.Read();
...
foo.Read();
foo.RWRWRWR..();
foo.CloseConnection();
Being in a multi-thread environment problems with multiple access to the same resources appeared, information started to be corrupted and many more. For example, multiple read and write started to execute at the same time and having only one connection (cursor) the information retrieved was corrupted.
Because there was only one instance of Foo, locks were added to Read and Write operations. They could not add locks in the locations where Read and Write methods because there were different flows and combinations.

  public void Write(...)
  {
    lock(padLock)
    {
      ...
      con.Write(...);
    }
  }
  
  public object Read()
  {
    lock(padLock)
    {
      ...
      ... con.Read();
      ...
    }
  }
The application started to work better, but they still observed that from time to time they have the same concurrence problems that cause the application to crash.
Can you spot the problem?
Even if lock block the access to a critical section, this is not the solution for our case. We need to make Read/Write operations atomic and to not allow a Read or Write operation to be executed in the same time.
To resolve this problem we have two simple solutions. The most simple fix, that would work for short time is using a Mutex. It is a synchronization primitive similar with a semaphore that has the size 1.
public class Foo
{
  FooConnection con;
  Mutex mutex = new Mutex();
  
  public void OpenConnection()
  {
    ...
    con.Open();
  }

  public void CloseConnection()
  {
    ...
    con.Close();    
  }

  public void Write(...)
  {
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...
    con.Write(...);
    mutex.ReleaseMutex();    
  }
  
  public object Read()
  {    
    mutex.WaitOne();
    ...
    ... con.Read();
    ...
    mutex.ReleaseMutex();
  }
}
Using a Mutex, we can ensure that only one thread will execute the code from Read or Write block. We will not have cases when on one thread execute the Read method and the other one executes the Write operation.
Other solutions could be used based on transaction or connection pattern (similar with the one that we use in ORM framework.

Comments

  1. There is only one way that the Mutex would work, and that is making the application run slower. Because Mutex is an interprocess communication synchronization object, being therefore heavier than the use of a simple lock. So this works as long as you want interprocess communication locking.

    The first method should've worked... but it is more likely that the problem is caused by the fact that one of the threads closed the resource too fast or opened the resource too late. First of all, you want to add locking around opening and closing, and second of all, you want to clear that handle when it's closed/not opened.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Database Modernization Matters for AI

  When companies transition to the cloud, they typically begin with applications and virtual machines, which is often the easier part of the process. The actual complexity arises later when databases are moved. To save time and effort, cloud adoption is more of a cloud migration in an IaaS manner, fulfilling current, but not future needs. Even organisations that are already in the cloud find that their databases, although “migrated,” are not genuinely modernised. This disparity becomes particularly evident when they begin to explore AI technologies. Understanding Modernisation Beyond Migration Database modernisation is distinct from merely relocating an outdated database to Azure. It's about making your data layer ready for future needs, like automation, real-time analytics, and AI capabilities. AI needs high throughput, which can be achieved using native DB cloud capabilities. When your database runs in a traditional setup (even hosted in the cloud), in that case, you will enc...

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...