Skip to main content

Simple load balancer for SQL Server Database

By
Two weeks ago I started to work on a PoC where the bottle neck is the database itself. We had a lot of complicated and expensive queries over the database. Because of this, if we wanted to have good performance we had to find a solution to have more than one instance of SQL Server.
Because the solution was on Windows Azure, we wanted to test different configurations and solution. We wanted to see what the performance is if we use 1, 2 and 3 instances of SQL endpoints. Not only this, we had different times of SQL endpoints –Azure SQL (SAS), Virtual Machine with SQL Server and SQL Azure Azure SQL Premium. (SAS but with dedicated resources).
 The good part in our scenario was that the data don’t change very often. We could start from the assumption that the database will be updated only one time per day. Because of this we could use different methods to create a load balancing from our SQL instances.
Because the time was very limited and the only think that we needed was to distributed the load on all the machines we decided to replicate the data on all the SQL instances and create a simple load balancer from code. We divided the tick time (timpstamp) with the number of instances and based on this we selected the SQL instance that will be hit. A simple mechanism that can be very easily managed for the PoC. Of course the final solution will be more complicated, but for a PoC this solution was perfect. In 10 minutes we had a load balancer  :-).
We checked the load of each machine and we can say that the queries were pretty good distributed. The load of each machine was almost the same (+/-10%)

 What others solution we could use?
Master-Slave – In this case we have multiple instances of SQL servers. Each slave can be used for reading operation and the master will be used for writing operations.
Sharding – The solution that we used to resolve our problem
AlwaysOn – The base concept is the same one as for Master-Slave
Transaction Replication – Is based on a snapshot and when data is changing, all the subscribers are notified about the change. You can filter individual database objects and publish changes to subscribers
Peer-to-Peer Replication – Is based on Transaction Replication, but with some new features
Change Tracking – Is a very base and simple tracking mechanisms.  The only thing that is notifing you is that a specific row had change. You don’t know any information related to the old or new value
Change Data Capture – Writes in the logs all the changes that are made over a table and are used to track and synchronize the rest of the database instances

Conclusion
We have a lot of solutions on the marker and for SQL Server. Based on our needs we needed to select the best one for us. I was surprised to see that a simple load balancer, written in 5 lines of code can do a pretty good stuff.

Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousMay 6, 2016 at 7:44 PM

    How should web.confgi should be modified in VS to accces master master replicated servers?

    I am getting error while usingv server = srv1, srv2;
    all other params are identical for servers.
    Any idea?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

By
In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

By
In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...
Post a Comment
Read more

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

By
Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...
8 comments
Read more