Simple load balancer for SQL Server Database

Two weeks ago I started to work on a PoC where the bottle neck is the database itself. We had a lot of complicated and expensive queries over the database. Because of this, if we wanted to have good performance we had to find a solution to have more than one instance of SQL Server.
Because the solution was on Windows Azure, we wanted to test different configurations and solution. We wanted to see what the performance is if we use 1, 2 and 3 instances of SQL endpoints. Not only this, we had different times of SQL endpoints –Azure SQL (SAS), Virtual Machine with SQL Server and SQL Azure Azure SQL Premium. (SAS but with dedicated resources).
The good part in our scenario was that the data don’t change very often. We could start from the assumption that the database will be updated only one time per day. Because of this we could use different methods to create a load balancing from our SQL instances.
Because the time was very limited and the only think that we needed was to distributed the load on all the machines we decided to replicate the data on all the SQL instances and create a simple load balancer from code. We divided the tick time (timpstamp) with the number of instances and based on this we selected the SQL instance that will be hit. A simple mechanism that can be very easily managed for the PoC. Of course the final solution will be more complicated, but for a PoC this solution was perfect. In 10 minutes we had a load balancer :-).
We checked the load of each machine and we can say that the queries were pretty good distributed. The load of each machine was almost the same (+/-10%)

What others solution we could use?
Master-Slave – In this case we have multiple instances of SQL servers. Each slave can be used for reading operation and the master will be used for writing operations.
Sharding – The solution that we used to resolve our problem
AlwaysOn – The base concept is the same one as for Master-Slave
Transaction Replication – Is based on a snapshot and when data is changing, all the subscribers are notified about the change. You can filter individual database objects and publish changes to subscribers
Peer-to-Peer Replication – Is based on Transaction Replication, but with some new features
Change Tracking – Is a very base and simple tracking mechanisms. The only thing that is notifing you is that a specific row had change. You don’t know any information related to the old or new value
Change Data Capture – Writes in the logs all the changes that are made over a table and are used to track and synchronize the rest of the database instances

Conclusion
We have a lot of solutions on the marker and for SQL Server. Based on our needs we needed to select the best one for us. I was surprised to see that a simple load balancer, written in 5 lines of code can do a pretty good stuff.

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users. This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users. Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Cloud as a Story - Vunvulea Radu

Search This Blog