Windows Azure Billing model - per-minute granularity tip

Windows Azure is changing. A lot of new features were released and existing one were improved. In this post I want to talk about one thing that was changed on Azure – the billing model.

Until now the paying granularity was per hour. This means that if I use a web-role for 30 minutes, then I would pay for an hour. If I use it for 1 hour and 1 minutes, then I would pay for 2 hours. Because other cloud providers offer services with per-minute granularity, Microsoft also decided to change the granularity to minutes.

This is great, you will pay only the time when you use a compute resource like web-roles, worker-roles, VMs, Mobile Services and so on). For classic application that use Azure for hosting and don’t scale (up and down) for short period of time this change will not affect the bill value at the end of the month – we will have the same flat value.

The true value of per-minute will be for application that scale up for very short period of time. For example we have a scenario where a client needs to process tens of millions of requests in a very short period of time. For example we want to process all this requests in 6 minutes – this task would repeat every day.

For this case when you need to scale for a very short period of time, a per-minutes payment solution is perfect. We can have for the same price 30 worker-roles that process the request instead of 10 or 15.

BUT, be aware of one thing – DON’T FORGET THAT YOU PAY FROM THE MOMENT WHEN THE INSTANCE STARTED AND THE DEPLOYMENT RUN ON THAT SPECIFIC INSTANCE.

This means that if you have a 6 minute job on the instance plus 10 minutes to start the instance and deploy your solution plus maybe 1 or 2 minute to stop the machine you will end up with 17-18 minutes. Is better then paying for a full hour, but we need to take care of this aspect when we prepare a cost estimation.

In conclusion, this change is great and give us the possibility to scale more with the same cost.

Comments

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage. But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too

Cloud as a Story - Vunvulea Radu

Search This Blog