Skip to main content

Coding Stories V - Serialization with XmlArrayItem

Serialization, almost all applications need this feature. Nowadays serialization can be in different formats. The trend now is to use JSON, but there are many applications that uses XML.
Let’s look over the following code:
public class Car
{
  public string Id { get; set; }
}
public class City
{
  [XmlArray("Cs")]
  [XmlArrayItem("C")]
  public List<Car> RegisterCars { get; set; }
}
...
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(City));
serializer.Serialize(writer, city);
Output:
<city>
  <Cs>
    <c>
      <id>1</id>
    <c>
    <c>
      <id>2</id>
    <c>
  <Cs>
</city>
Even if the code compiles, works perfectly, there is a small thing that can affect us. Because we use XmlArrayItem attribute, each node from the list will be named “C”. If we will need to deserialize only a C node then we will have a surprise.
This cannot be done with the default XmlSerializer class.
XmlSerializer serializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(Car));
serializer.Deserialize("<c><id>1</id></c>");
This will expect a node named “Car”, that cannot be found there.
Because of this, when we need to control the name of the nodes from a list and I recommend to not use the XmlArrayItem. A better approach is with [XmlRoot(ElementName = "c")] on the Car class. Using this approach, we will be able to deserialize a child node of the list without having to deserialize all the list.
The final code will look like this:
[XmlRoot(ElementName = "c")]
public class Car
{
  public string Id { get; set; }
}
public class City
{
  [XmlArray("Cs")]
  public List<Car> RegisterCars { get; set; }
}
Even if this is a small thing, on a big project this can affect how different components deserialize the content. Deciding how items need to be serialized is an important step that needs to be done from the beginning.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too