Skip to main content

WCF and "Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation …" errors

These days I had to update a component that is used in Microsoft Dynamic AX. I don’t know to work with AX, but some time ago I had to write a component in C# that calls a WCF service of a 3rd party and is used by an AX application.
The client proxy from C# component was update with the new client proxy; the code was also updated with the new logic. The unit-tests were updated also and we had a full green. Perfect, we send the component to AX team to update the reference to the component.
They come back to us with a big ugly error:
Error in deserializing body of reply message for operation …
WTF, we had the same endpoint. We had a client proxy that works on our unit-tests and a command line test application, but when AX make calls using our component we get this great error message. The oddest thing is that we receive this error even if the message that is returned from the endpoint has only 20 characters. Before updating the AX worked great with our component.
Looking over the internet we found we should need to increase the message size. We increased the size of the message like this:
<readerQuotas maxDepth="999990" maxStringContentLength="999990" maxArrayLength="999990" 
maxBytesPerRead="999990" maxNameTableCharCount="999990" />
This can be updated from code, if you have a custom binding that is set from code:
bindingElement.ReaderQuotas.MaxArrayLength = Int32.MaxValue;
bindingElement.ReaderQuotas.MaxBytesPerRead = Int32.MaxValue;
bindingElement.ReaderQuotas.MaxDepth = Int32.MaxValue;
bindingElement.ReaderQuotas.MaxNameTableCharCount = Int32.MaxValue;
bindingElement.ReaderQuotas.MaxStringContentLength = Int32.MaxValue;
Get what? The problem was solved, everything works as expected. The interesting thing is that even if the message from the servers was very small we still received the error message if we don’t set the reader quotas.
The error was pretty interesting, because we received this even if the message was extremely small.

Comments

  1. Or in other words: 'If nothing else works, get a bigger hammer..' :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems that this there is a problem related to this on AX. This is why X++ is not for us :-)

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Entity Framework (EF) TransactionScope vs Database.BeginTransaction

In today blog post we will talk a little about a new feature that is available on EF6+ related to Transactions.
Until now, when we had to use transaction we used ‘TransactionScope’. It works great and I would say that is something that is now in our blood.
using (var scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required)) { using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection("...")) { conn.Open(); SqlCommand sqlCommand = new SqlCommand(); sqlCommand.Connection = conn; sqlCommand.CommandText = ... sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); ... } scope.Complete(); } Starting with EF6.0 we have a new way to work with transactions. The new approach is based on Database.BeginTransaction(), Database.Rollback(), Database.Commit(). Yes, no more TransactionScope.
In the followi…