Skip to main content

Duplicate Detection in Windows Azure Service Bus

One great feature of Windows Azure Service Bus is the ability to identify the messages that are duplicate. Using this feature we can automatically remove messages from Service Bus Queue or Topic when we have more than one the same message. By default this mechanism is deactivated, but we can activate it very easily.
Let’s see how this mechanism works. When we activate this mechanism Windows Azure Service Bus will start to store a history with our messages. This period of time can be configures from only a few minutes to days. If a duplicate message is send to Service Bus, the service will automatically ignore the message.
Because the content of each message need to be serializable, the duplicate detection mechanism will look to the serialized items that were added to the message. If the content is the same, than the message will be consider as duplicate. For example we have the following class that we add to each message:
[DataContract]
public Foo
{
    [DataMember]
    public string Id { get; set;}
    [DataMember]
    public string Name { get; set;}
}
If we will add two messages with objects of type Foo with the same id and name, than the second message will be consider duplicate. We will not receive any kind of notification when we will try to send the second message.
MessagingFactory factory = MessagingFactory.Create([uri], [tokenProvider]);
MessageSender sender = factory.CreateMessageSender("FooQueue")

Foo obj1 = new Foo() { Id = “1”, Name = “One” };
BrokeredMessage message1 = new BrokeredMessage(obj1);

Foo obj2 = new Foo() { Id = “1”, Name = “One” };
BrokeredMessage message2 = new BrokeredMessage(obj2);

sender.Send(message1);
sender.Send(message2);
It is very important to remember that the duplicate detection mechanism will use the space from our Service Bus to persist the old messages. Because of this it is very important to be careful when we set the history time period.
This configuration can be made from two places. One is from portal, when we can activate this feature and set the history time period. This feature will be available only if you select “Custom create”.

The second place from where this can be configuration can done is from code. In the moment when we create a new Service Bus Topic or Service Bus Queue we can specify in the create command. To be able to do this we will need to create a TopicDescription or a QueueDescription object. In this object we can activate this functionality and set the history time period.
Topic:
TopicDescription fooTopicDescription = new TopicDescription("FooTopic")
    {
        RequiresDuplicateDetection = true,
        DuplicateDetectionHistoryTimeWindow = new TimeSpan(10, 0, 0),
    };
namespaceManager.CreateTopic(fooTopicDescription);
Queue:
QueueDescription fooQueueDescription = new QueueDescription("FooQueue")
    {
        RequiresDuplicateDetection = true,
        DuplicateDetectionHistoryTimeWindow = new TimeSpan(10, 0, 0),
    };

namespaceManager.CreateQueue(fooQueueDescription);
These policy settings of Service Bus Queue or Service Bus Topic can be changed only on creating time. After this, if we want to change the history time period or to deactivate it, it will not be possible. To be able to do this, you will need to delete the resource and recreate it.
This is a great feature that can be used when we need to avoid duplicate messages to be added to our Service Bus.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too