Skip to main content

CDN is not the only solution to improve the page speed - Reverse Caching Proxy

I heard more and more often think like this: “If your website is to slow, you should use a CDN.” Great, CDN is THE solution for any kind of problems… or not. Depends what is our problem.
First of all let’s see what does CDN means. Content Delivery Network gives us the possibility to improve our web application performance by distributing our content in different geographical location that is closed to our client. This is a great solution when we have static content like images, videos or any kind of static content.
In this moment there are a lot of great solutions, from Azure CDN that are very easy to config and scalable to EdgeCast or Akamai.
But maybe our problem is not from there. What happens if users are in the same geographical region? Using a CDN may or not may improve our speed performance. The entire request will hit our servers. A bunny will tell us: “It’s not a problem dude, we live in the cloud nowadays, scale up your application on more instances”.
HTTP Caching Reverse Proxy is used for caching HTTP content. It is a proxy that stays between your servers and end uses. All the inbound traffic will hit your proxy and after that your web servers. This proxy will try to cache all the content (dynamical one) and will response to the client with the cached information (when is possible). What kind of content is cached can be directly controlled from images, to CSS or dynamic content.
The reverse cache proxy is faster than our web servers, because all the assets can be served more rapidly. The content of the reverse cache proxy is not complicated and is not so mixed like our web servers. Because reserve cache proxies take a part of the calls that should hit our web servers, the web servers will respond faster. Web server will be able to server request that are more specific and will not spend precious resources delivering content.
Let’s see why a reverse cache proxy is good:
  • Any kind of content can be cached, from static one to dynamically one
  • We can control the cache flush
  • Our web servers will not be so loaded, reverse cache proxy will unload our servers
  • The application don’t need to know about this caching mechanism and switching between with or without reverse caching mechanism can be without caching application
Let’s see what the properties of CDNs are
  • Can be used out-of-the-box, it is implemented by another provider and we only need to use it
  • Not connected with our application
  • It is great for static content, that don’t change very often
  • URLs need to be change a little to be able to use CDN
  • A lot of servers located in different locations
  • It is not connected with our application
  • Recent CDNs can cache dynamic content also
And not the big question… When we should use CDN and when we should use reverse cache proxy?
Caching static content based on geographically location of the users (we eliminate the delay caused generated by user-location) is suitable for CDNs
If we want to reduce the trips to our web-serves, calls to our database and cache frequently content (dynamic, not only static) that reverse cache proxy can be our solution
In conclusion we saw when a CDN or a reverse cache proxy is good. We could say that CDN don’t eliminate the need of a reverse cache proxy. And a reverser cache proxy doesn’t eliminate the need of CDN. We can use both type of caching.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to check in AngularJS if a service was register or not

There are cases when you need to check in a service or a controller was register in AngularJS.
For example a valid use case is when you have the same implementation running on multiple application. In this case, you may want to intercept the HTTP provider and add a custom step there. This step don’t needs to run on all the application, only in the one where the service exist and register.
A solution for this case would be to have a flag in the configuration that specify this. In the core you would have an IF that would check the value of this flag.
Another solution is to check if a specific service was register in AngularJS or not. If the service was register that you would execute your own logic.
To check if a service was register or not in AngularJS container you need to call the ‘has’ method of ‘inhector’. It will return TRUE if the service was register.
if ($injector.has('httpInterceptorService')) { $httpProvider.interceptors.push('httpInterceptorService&#…

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine:
threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration:

TeamCity.NET 4.51EF 6.0.2VS2013
It seems that there …

Run native .NET application in Docker (.NET Framework 4.6.2)

Scope
The main scope of this post is to see how we can run a legacy application written in .NET Framework in Docker.

Context
First of all, let’s define what is a legacy application in our context. By a legacy application we understand an application that runs .NET Framework 3.5 or higher in a production environment where we don’t have any more the people or documentation that would help us to understand what is happening behind the scene.
In this scenarios, you might want to migrate the current solution from a standard environment to Docker. There are many advantages for such a migration, like:

Continuous DeploymentTestingIsolationSecurity at container levelVersioning ControlEnvironment Standardization
Until now, we didn’t had the possibility to run a .NET application in Docker. With .NET Core, there was support for .NET Core in Docker, but migration from a full .NET framework to .NET Core can be costly and even impossible. Not only because of lack of features, but also because once you…