Skip to main content

Patterns in Windows Azure Service Bus - Message Filter Pattern



In the last post I tacked about Splitter Pattern.Today we will continue with Message Filter Pattern. This pattern can be used with success with Windows Azure Service Bus.
As the name says, all the messages are filtered based on specific rules. Any message that will reach the consumer will be filter based on this rules. All the producers will use the same entry point where they will add messages. They don’t have to know that messages are filtered based on same rules. In this way, the message system will create a decoupling between the producer and the consumer. This pattern is used to be able to control the messages that where not routed to any subscriber.
Windows Azure Service Bus Topics can be used for this purpose. It gives us the ability to define rules that can check the messages content based on meta-information. These rules will be added to each subscriber and will specify if the messages will be accepted or not.
SqlFilter myCustomFilter =
    new SqlFilter("grade < 5");
namespaceManager.CreateSubscription(
               "StudentsGradesTopic",
               "StudentsWithProblemsSubscription",      
               myCustomFilter);  
 In the following example I created a subscription that accept messages that have the grade under 5. For more information about defining custom rules: http://www.vunvulearadu.blogspot.hu/2012/08/service-bus-topics-how-to-use-it-part-2.html
When we are using this pattern, consumers will only receive and process messages that where filtered. Because of this, we can have messages in the system that will not pass any filter. This messages need to be tracked in one way or another. For these situations we can define a custom rule in Service Bus Topic that will receive messages that didn’t pass the rest of the rules of the subscribers. The name of the filter expression is “MatchNoneFilterExpression”. In the following example we setup a rule that accept messages that didn’t pass the rest of the rules.
RuleDescription notConsumedMessagesRule = new RuleDescription()
{
     FilterAction = new SqlFilterAction(“set isNotConsumed = true;”),
     FilterExpression = new MatchNoneFilterExpression()
};
subscription.Add(notConsumedMessagesRule);

This pattern can be used with success when we need to control what kind of messages is received by each consumer. We can imagine that we need to manage grades from a university. For this purpose each department want to receive information related to them. The history department doesn’t want to receive grades from the mathematic department. For this case the Message Filter Pattern can help us a lot because it created only one entry point for the applications and services that add these messages.
Last edit: A list of all patterns that can be used with Windows Azure Service Bus, that were described by me LINK.  

Comments

  1. With Library 1.7 I don't see MatchNoneFilterExpression class in any of the dll.
    How do I implement this pattern without MatchNoneFilterExpression?

    ~Bhavya

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look here: http://vunvulearadu.blogspot.ro/2012/12/windows-azure-service-bus-topic-detect.html

      Delete
    2. thanks Radu. Will give it a try and let you know.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

What to do when you hit the throughput limits of Azure Storage (Blobs)

In this post we will talk about how we can detect when we hit a throughput limit of Azure Storage and what we can do in that moment. Context If we take a look on Scalability Targets of Azure Storage ( https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/storage-scalability-targets/ ) we will observe that the limits are prety high. But, based on our business logic we can end up at this limits. If you create a system that is hitted by a high number of device, you can hit easily the total number of requests rate that can be done on a Storage Account. This limits on Azure is 20.000 IOPS (entities or messages per second) where (and this is very important) the size of the request is 1KB. Normally, if you make a load tests where 20.000 clients will hit different blobs storages from the same Azure Storage Account, this limits can be reached. How we can detect this problem? From client, we can detect that this limits was reached based on the HTTP error code that is returned by HTTP