Skip to main content

Patterns in Windows Azure Service Bus - Message Filter Pattern



In the last post I tacked about Splitter Pattern.Today we will continue with Message Filter Pattern. This pattern can be used with success with Windows Azure Service Bus.
As the name says, all the messages are filtered based on specific rules. Any message that will reach the consumer will be filter based on this rules. All the producers will use the same entry point where they will add messages. They don’t have to know that messages are filtered based on same rules. In this way, the message system will create a decoupling between the producer and the consumer. This pattern is used to be able to control the messages that where not routed to any subscriber.
Windows Azure Service Bus Topics can be used for this purpose. It gives us the ability to define rules that can check the messages content based on meta-information. These rules will be added to each subscriber and will specify if the messages will be accepted or not.
SqlFilter myCustomFilter =
    new SqlFilter("grade < 5");
namespaceManager.CreateSubscription(
               "StudentsGradesTopic",
               "StudentsWithProblemsSubscription",      
               myCustomFilter);  
 In the following example I created a subscription that accept messages that have the grade under 5. For more information about defining custom rules: http://www.vunvulearadu.blogspot.hu/2012/08/service-bus-topics-how-to-use-it-part-2.html
When we are using this pattern, consumers will only receive and process messages that where filtered. Because of this, we can have messages in the system that will not pass any filter. This messages need to be tracked in one way or another. For these situations we can define a custom rule in Service Bus Topic that will receive messages that didn’t pass the rest of the rules of the subscribers. The name of the filter expression is “MatchNoneFilterExpression”. In the following example we setup a rule that accept messages that didn’t pass the rest of the rules.
RuleDescription notConsumedMessagesRule = new RuleDescription()
{
     FilterAction = new SqlFilterAction(“set isNotConsumed = true;”),
     FilterExpression = new MatchNoneFilterExpression()
};
subscription.Add(notConsumedMessagesRule);

This pattern can be used with success when we need to control what kind of messages is received by each consumer. We can imagine that we need to manage grades from a university. For this purpose each department want to receive information related to them. The history department doesn’t want to receive grades from the mathematic department. For this case the Message Filter Pattern can help us a lot because it created only one entry point for the applications and services that add these messages.
Last edit: A list of all patterns that can be used with Windows Azure Service Bus, that were described by me LINK.  

Comments

  1. With Library 1.7 I don't see MatchNoneFilterExpression class in any of the dll.
    How do I implement this pattern without MatchNoneFilterExpression?

    ~Bhavya

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Look here: http://vunvulearadu.blogspot.ro/2012/12/windows-azure-service-bus-topic-detect.html

      Delete
    2. thanks Radu. Will give it a try and let you know.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too