Skip to main content

Patterns in Windows Azure Service Bus - Message Splitter Pattern

In one of my post about Service Bus Topics from Windows Azure I told you that I will write about a post that describe how we can design an application that can route messages for a house which is controlled remotely. Before we can talk about this we need to see some design patterns that can be used in combination with Service Bus. I will write a series of post about this.
We will start with Splitter pattern. This pattern refers to the ability to have a collection of messages parts that form one message or an entity for us. This pattern gives as the ability to receive and process messages from the related messages separately. In this way all the messages that belong to that message part will be sent to the same consumer.
 
How we can use this pattern in Service Bus? Hmm, is pretty simple. We can use SessionId property of a message for this. In this way, when a client (consumer) start to receive a message with a given session id, we can specify to receive only messages with the given id. Service Bus guarantees that the messages from the given session will be received in the same order they were added.
When a client start to receive messages of a specific session, the session is automatically locked. Only that client will be able to receive messages with the given session id. This action is a transactional action. Because of this, if something will happen with the consumer (crash for example), all the messages for the specific session will be received, even if the client that consumed a part of the messages from that session crashed.
To be able to lock the messages from Service Bus to be consumed only by the client that started to receive messages with a given session id we need to the RequiresSession property of the QueueDescription or SubscriptionDescription. This is the only configuration that needs to be done on the Service Bus. On the consumer don’t forget to use the AcceptMessageSession() method to receive a reference to a session from ServiceBus. This method can be found under the abstract class MessageClientEntity that is implemented by all the crucial classes that are used to receive messages from Service Bus:
  • QueueClient
  • TopicClient
  • SubscriptionClient
  • MessageSender
  • MessageReceiver
  • MessagingFactory
Because of this we can write the same code that will be used when we use queues or topics. More information about how you can write code that can consume Service Bus Queues and Service Bus Topics can be found on the following link: www.vunvulearadu.blogspot.com/2012/08/service-bus-topic-how-we-can-migrate.html
In the next example I will get a reference to MessageSession from a queue, a topic and a MessageReceiver.
MessageReceiver
// Service Bus Queue
QueueClient queueClient =QueueClient.CreateFromConnectionString(
     myFooConnectionString, 
     "FooQueue");
MessageSession sessionFromQueue = queueClient.AcceptMessageSession();
// Service Bus Topic
SubscriptionClient subscriptionClient = SubscriptionClient.CreateFromConnectionString(
     CloudConfigurationManager.GetSetting(
          "ServiceBusConnectionString"),
          "myFooTopic",
          "seccondSubscription");
MessageSession sessionFromSubscriber = subscriptionClient.AcceptMessageSession();
// MessageReceiver
Uri serviceAddress = ServiceBusEnvironment.CreateServiceUri("sb", “myFooNamspace”, string.Empty);
MessagingFactory messagingFactory  = MessagingFactory.Create(serviceAddress, credentials);
MessageReceiver messageReceiver = messagingFactory.CreateMessageReceiver(“myFooQueueName”);
MessageSession sessionFromMessageReceiver = messageReceiver.AcceptMessageSession();
Don’t forget to activate the session support from the queue or topic of the Service Bus.
QueueDescription queueDescription = new QueueDescription("FooQueue");
queueDescription.MaxSizeInMegabytes = 5120;
queueDescription.DefaultMessageTimeToLive = new TimeSpan(0, 10, 30);
queueDescription.RequiresSession = true;
if (!namespaceManager.QueueExists("FooQueue"))
{
    namespaceManager.CreateQueue(queueDescription);
}

Once we have the reference to MessageSession we can consume messages with the same session id using Receive method of the MessageSession (as a hint: the base class of this class is MessageReceiver).
while ( true )
{
     BrokeredMessage message = session.Receive();
     ...
     message.Complete();
}
This pattern can be used when we the messages are a specific order that is important for the received. We want to be able to specify where the messages need to be sent. As an example we can imagine a hyper-market that sell a lot of things. Based on the type of the product we have different services that need to consume these messages and process this. For this case, each session can be a different product category. Another case when slitter pattern is very useful is for the case when we want to send content that is too big for a message. For this case we need to use a splitter.
Tomorrow we will continue with another pattern where Windows Azure Service Bus can be used.
Last edit: A list of all patterns that can be used with Windows Azure Service Bus, that were described by me LINK

Comments

  1. Interesting!
    There is a very good book on this subject:
    http://www.amazon.com/Enterprise-Integration-Patterns-Designing-Deploying/dp/0321200683

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provided a too