Skip to main content

MSTEST - CollectionAssert

In orice proiect ar trebuii sa existe unit teste. In general, pentru validare, fiecare test poate sa contina Assert-uri de forma:
Assert.IsNotNull(result);
Assert.AreEqual(1,result.Count);
...
In cazul in care este nevoie sa validam o lista, folosim un foreach sau orice mod de a itera o lista:
foreach(var item in result.Items)
{
    Assert.IsTrue(baseResult.Contains(item));
}
.NET ne pune la dispoztie pe langa Assert si clasa CollectionAssert, prin intermediul careia putem sa validam o colectie. Mai jos o sa trec peste cateva metode care mi s-au parut mai importante:
  • CollectionAssert.AreNotNull - verifica ca toate elementele din colectie sa nu fie NULL
  • CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreInstancesOfType - verifica daca toate elementele din colectie sunt de un anumit tip( tipul poate sa fie si o interfata)
  • CollectionAssert.AllItemsAreUnique - verifica daca toate elementele din colectie sunt diferite( fiecare element din colectie se compara cu restul folosind metoda Equal). Optional se poate specifica un IComparer pentru a se face o comparatie custom.
  • CollectionAssert.AreEqual - Verifica daca doua colectii sunt egale( din nou metoda Equal este folosita)
  • CollectionAssert.AreEquivalent - Este asemanator cu AreEqual, dar elementele pot sa apara in orice ordine. De exemplu doua colectii o sa fie echivalente daca au acelasi numar de elemente si fiecare element din prima colectie este egal cu un element din a doua colectie.
  • CollectionAssert.Contains - verifica daca o colectie contine un anumit element
  • CollectionAssert.IsSubsetOf - verifica ca prima colectie este o submultime a celei de a doua colectie
Mai jos gasitit un exemplu care verifica ca doua colectii sunt egale:
HashSet<string> collectionOne = new HashSet<string>(){"A","B"};
HashSet<string> CollectionTwo = new HashSet<string>(){"B","A"};
CollectionAssert.AreEquivalent(collectionOne, collectionTwo);
Este bine de stiut ca fiecare din aceaste metode are si echivalentul pentru negatie. Pentru mai multe informatii puteti accesa: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.visualstudio.testtools.unittesting.collectionassert%28v=vs.100%29.aspx

Comments

  1. Ar fi frumos daca unit testing-ul nu ar mai fi 2nd hand citizen, si MS ar face niste upgrade-uri la el, gen support pentru lamba.
    Un candidat excepent ar fi chiar partea de collection assert unde uneori ai nevoie sa ai niste reguli de echivalenta "custom".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

Cloud Myths: Cloud is Cheaper (Pill 1 of 5 / Cloud Pills) The idea that moving to the cloud reduces the costs is a common misconception. The cloud infrastructure provides flexibility, scalability, and better CAPEX, but it does not guarantee lower costs without proper optimisation and management of the cloud services and infrastructure. Idle and unused resources, overprovisioning, oversize databases, and unnecessary data transfer can increase running costs. The regional pricing mode, multi-cloud complexity, and cost variety add extra complexity to the cost function. Cloud adoption without a cost governance strategy can result in unexpected expenses. Improper usage, combined with a pay-as-you-go model, can result in a nightmare for business stakeholders who cannot track and manage the monthly costs. Cloud-native services such as AI services, managed databases, and analytics platforms are powerful, provide out-of-the-shelve capabilities, and increase business agility and innovation. H...

Cloud Myths: Migrating to the cloud is quick and easy (Pill 2 of 5 / Cloud Pills)

The idea that migration to the cloud is simple, straightforward and rapid is a wrong assumption. It’s a common misconception of business stakeholders that generates delays, budget overruns and technical dept. A migration requires laborious planning, technical expertise and a rigorous process.  Migrations, especially cloud migrations, are not one-size-fits-all journeys. One of the most critical steps is under evaluation, under budget and under consideration. The evaluation phase, where existing infrastructure, applications, database, network and the end-to-end estate are evaluated and mapped to a cloud strategy, is crucial to ensure the success of cloud migration. Additional factors such as security, compliance, and system dependencies increase the complexity of cloud migration.  A misconception regarding lift-and-shits is that they are fast and cheap. Moving applications to the cloud without changes does not provide the capability to optimise costs and performance, leading to ...