Skip to main content

#IF DEBUG can be replaces with Conditional attribute

Pe un proiect legacy la care am lucrat anul acesta apareau destul de conditia urmatoare:
#if DEBUG
     //Some code
#endif
Natura proiectului ne obliga sa avem astfel de cod. Problema era ca uneori noi compilam proiectul configurat pentru RELEASE, faceam modificari la cod si in RELEASE totul parea in ordine, dar pe masina de build, aveam erori de compilare, deoarece acesta compila in DEBUG.
Am descoperit zilele acestea un nou atribut care poate sa inlocuiasca aceasta conditie urata.
[Conditional("DEBUG")]
public static void DoSomething()
{
     //Some code
}
Metoda DoSomething o sa fie apelata doar in cazul proiectul este compilat in DEBUG mode.
Cand putem sa folosim aceast atribut?
  • se poate folosi doar in interiorul unei clase sau a unei structuri. Nu incercati sa il puneti pe metoda unei interfete, deoarece o sa dea eroare la compilare
  • metoda pe care o decorati cu acest atribut nu trebuie sa fie neaparat statica, dar nu are voie sa fie implementarea  unei metode din interfata
  • metoda nu trebuie sa fie marcata cu override, dar poate sa contina atributul virtual
  • valoarea returnata de aceasta metoda trebuie obligatoriu sa fie void
Singurul lucru care poate sa  fie confusing este urmatorul cod:
public class Car
{
     public Car()
     {
          DoSomething();
     }     
     [Conditional("DEBUG")]
     public void DoSomething()
    {
          //Some code.
    }    
}
Ce o sa se intample la compilare daca avem setat RELEASE? O sa avem o eroare de compilare? Se va mai apela  metoda noastra? Raspunsul este ca codul general de IL nu va include si apelul la metoda DoSomething() daca compilam pentru RELEASE.
Personal incerc sa evit sa folosesc aceste conditii, nu sunt foarte sanatoase. Dar daca lucram deja pe un proiect care contine conditii de tip #if DEBUG, pentru a refactoriza codul si a scapa de aceste conditii, primul pas este sa le scoatem ca si metode separate, decorate cu atributul Conditional.

Comments

  1. Fain - asa e implementat si Debug.Assert, de ex..

    De conditional compilation in general nu prea ai cum sa scapi cand codul contine metode proprii de logging sau profiling care trebuie sa se execute doar la debug, nu si in release..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Drept. Dar macar le putem tine frumos grupate. Urasc sa dau de cod care contine atat logica cat si tot felu de conditii de compilare.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Adevarul e ca in C#, care nu are un preprocessor adevarat precum C++, genul asta de directive e mult mai rar folosit..

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...

Navigating Cloud Strategy after Azure Central US Region Outage

 Looking back, July 19, 2024, was challenging for customers using Microsoft Azure or Windows machines. Two major outages affected customers using CrowdStrike Falcon or Microsoft Azure computation resources in the Central US. These two outages affected many people and put many businesses on pause for a few hours or even days. The overlap of these two issues was a nightmare for travellers. In addition to blue screens in the airport terminals, they could not get additional information from the airport website, airline personnel, or the support line because they were affected by the outage in the Central US region or the CrowdStrike outage.   But what happened in reality? A faulty CrowdStrike update affected Windows computers globally, from airports and healthcare to small businesses, affecting over 8.5m computers. Even if the Falson Sensor software defect was identified and a fix deployed shortly after, the recovery took longer. In parallel with CrowdStrike, Microsoft provi...