Skip to main content

Part 3 - In-scope workload / The landing zone of a PCI-DSS compliant application inside Microsoft Azure

The last article was about shared responsibility between the three parties that are involved Microsoft Azure, Kubernetes (AKS) and the customer. In today's post, we tackle Azure Kubernetes Services and where the workload would need to run.

Azure Kubernetes Services (AKS) runs all the payloads where card data are decrypted and processed. It is required to run in a private cluster with no direct access to the internet. All the traffic must be limited to the private network, without direct access to and from the internet. It applies for workloads that process card data (in-scope)

A dedicated node pool with a subnet is used for in-scope components (services handling card data). The payload runs in isolated node pools, isolated from the rest of the system. Additional node pools can be created for workloads that are not out-of-scope of PCI-DSS. Using such a topology, we can move the services from out-of-scope to in-scope seamless without significant changes in the architecture of the infrastructure. 

The pod security should not be ignored we need to ensure that we:

(1) Removing the Linux capabilities

(2) Configure the securityContext of containers

(3) Use the image ID to ensure you have a reliable map of the containers

(4) Use Azure Policy to ensure that image ID is used 

For a more extensive system, where the complexity is higher, there can be an approach where the in-scope workload runs in a dedicated ASK cluster, and the out-of-scope has its own cluster (dedicated or shared). It is a more expensive solution but with a higher isolation level between the in-scope workloads and the rest of the system. For ingress, we can use controllers like NGINX or Caddy. As long as we can control the flow of data and balance it between the node pool. 


All pods need to have restricted network policies defined, and only specific traffic to be allowed.  Direct communication between in-scope and out-of-scope workloads can exist, but strict policy definitions must be implemented. Additionally, when you have direct communication between the namespaces (in the case of a mesh) or outside the mesh, a security layer like mTLS with a compatible certificate issuer needs to be used.

The AKS cluster is not publicly available on the internet. Meaning that a support engineer would not be able to connect to it. A jump box is required, combined with strict IP ranges that are allowed to access the cluster and execute commands. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Windows Docker Containers can make WIN32 API calls, use COM and ASP.NET WebForms

After the last post , I received two interesting questions related to Docker and Windows. People were interested if we do Win32 API calls from a Docker container and if there is support for COM. WIN32 Support To test calls to WIN32 API, let’s try to populate SYSTEM_INFO class. [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SYSTEM_INFO { public uint dwOemId; public uint dwPageSize; public uint lpMinimumApplicationAddress; public uint lpMaximumApplicationAddress; public uint dwActiveProcessorMask; public uint dwNumberOfProcessors; public uint dwProcessorType; public uint dwAllocationGranularity; public uint dwProcessorLevel; public uint dwProcessorRevision; } ... [DllImport("kernel32")] static extern void GetSystemInfo(ref SYSTEM_INFO pSI); ... SYSTEM_INFO pSI = new SYSTEM_INFO(

Azure AD and AWS Cognito side-by-side

In the last few weeks, I was involved in multiple opportunities on Microsoft Azure and Amazon, where we had to analyse AWS Cognito, Azure AD and other solutions that are available on the market. I decided to consolidate in one post all features and differences that I identified for both of them that we should need to take into account. Take into account that Azure AD is an identity and access management services well integrated with Microsoft stack. In comparison, AWS Cognito is just a user sign-up, sign-in and access control and nothing more. The focus is not on the main features, is more on small things that can make a difference when you want to decide where we want to store and manage our users.  This information might be useful in the future when we need to decide where we want to keep and manage our users.  Feature Azure AD (B2C, B2C) AWS Cognito Access token lifetime Default 1h – the value is configurable 1h – cannot be modified

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see