Skip to main content

SOC Reports on Azure, Azure DevOps and O365

 Let's talk today about SOC reports that are available for Azure and other Microsoft services that are used nowadays. 

What is a SOC Report?

It is an audit report that it is verifiable and performed by a CPA (Certified Public Accountant). The main purpose is to do a systematic control in a service organization and provide insights related to financial audit and how they perform. We could say that it is a collection of safeguards that are checked and validated.

SOC Types

There are 3 types of SOC reports used in a different context and covers different areas of business and finances. You can see the main characteristics below.


What does Microsoft is offering to us?

Microsoft is offering on the Compliance Report portal all the SOC reports that are available. They are publicly available and can be used by Microsoft customers, at the moment in time when an audit is done.

Depending on the type of organization that you are part of, you might be required to have these reports or bridge letter updated one time per year or 2-4 types. This is when the bridge letter becomes very important. 

If we take the example of Office 365, we will see that the last SOC report was published in September 2019. From that one, we had each quarter a new bride letter (e.g. Q4 2020). 

For Office 365 we are covered on each quarter with SOC reports and bridge letters. Things are not the same for other services like Azure, Dynamic 365 where we have SOC reports available one time per year, but without any bride letters available. It means that if you are required to provide SOC reports two of four times per year for services that you are using inside the organization, this would not be possible using the SOC reports that are publicly available. 

Final thoughts 

Things are a little crazy at the moment in time when you need to provide SOC evidence for Microsoft services more often than one time per year. If you are in a context where you don't find the reports that you are looking for you shall contact the Microsoft team to require the needed reports. In most of the cases, they are available, but not published on the public portal. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to audit an Azure Cosmos DB

In this post, we will talk about how we can audit an Azure Cosmos DB database. Before jumping into the problem let us define the business requirement: As an Administrator I want to be able to audit all changes that were done to specific collection inside my Azure Cosmos DB. The requirement is simple, but can be a little tricky to implement fully. First of all when you are using Azure Cosmos DB or any other storage solution there are 99% odds that you’ll have more than one system that writes data to it. This means that you have or not have control on the systems that are doing any create/update/delete operations. Solution 1: Diagnostic Logs Cosmos DB allows us activate diagnostics logs and stream the output a storage account for achieving to other systems like Event Hub or Log Analytics. This would allow us to have information related to who, when, what, response code and how the access operation to our Cosmos DB was done. Beside this there is a field that specifies what was th...

Can User Technical Profile Influence AI Architecture Decisions?

In the last few days, I ran a small experiment on Devin/Windsurf/Cascade, BMAD, and LLM-based architecture decisions. The initial concern was simple: if an AI coding assistant knows something about the user, for example, that the user is a Java developer or a .NET developer, can this information influence the architecture and technology stack that the AI will propose? This question is important because many companies are starting to use AI tools not only for coding but also for product discovery, architecture, documentation, and technical decision-making. If the AI is influenced by the developer's personal profile, the result may not be fully neutral. It may look like a business or architecture decision, but in reality, it may be partially shaped by the context of the person using the tool. The test was done using BMAD with Devin/Windsurf/Cascade. The scenario was a unified field service operations platform. The task was to let BMAD refine the product, define the architecture and s...

ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded

Today blog post will be started with the following error when running DB tests on the CI machine: threw exception: System.InvalidOperationException: The Entity Framework provider type 'System.Data.Entity.SqlServer.SqlProviderServices, EntityFramework.SqlServer' registered in the application config file for the ADO.NET provider with invariant name 'System.Data.SqlClient' could not be loaded. Make sure that the assembly-qualified name is used and that the assembly is available to the running application. See http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260882 for more information. at System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure.DependencyResolution.ProviderServicesFactory.GetInstance(String providerTypeName, String providerInvariantName) This error happened only on the Continuous Integration machine. On the devs machines, everything has fine. The classic problem – on my machine it’s working. The CI has the following configuration: TeamCity .NET 4.51 EF 6.0.2 VS2013 It see...